tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post113989462825561085..comments2024-03-25T07:29:08.216-04:00Comments on 2 Political Junkies: "There's something screwy around here."Mariahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10439330154875628083noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139952060405617972006-02-14T16:21:00.000-05:002006-02-14T16:21:00.000-05:00about family, unless you have a very small one, i'...about family, unless you have a very small one, i'm pretty sure there is at least 1 possibly 2 that aren't "mother teresa" so i will not blame an entire family for 1 member, BUT that doesn't mean that i wouldn't want them interviewed after a horrendous deed by one of them. gee, isn't that what is considered good police procedure?<BR/>i truly wish some people would admit or at least try to understand that no 1 party has all saints in it or all sinners. this is not tv wrestling here and it isn't taking sides rooting for a football team, this is not about one upsmanship braden or clever little spins. we are all in this together. it's our country. there are good and bad and average in both parties,and, i'm really sorry if i somehow insulted the good name of your family, i thought the waltons were fictional. : )Sherry Pasquarellohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06107407102753464356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139951471156775172006-02-14T16:11:00.000-05:002006-02-14T16:11:00.000-05:00sounds as if anonymous cannot respond with any oun...sounds as if anonymous cannot respond with any ounce of intelligenceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139949126331831602006-02-14T15:32:00.000-05:002006-02-14T15:32:00.000-05:00Braden go back to Trollville. No wonder you have n...Braden go back to Trollville. No wonder you have no friendsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139948809719480162006-02-14T15:26:00.000-05:002006-02-14T15:26:00.000-05:00Sherry --Ahhh, so what you're saying is that it's ...Sherry --<BR/><BR/>Ahhh, so what you're saying is that it's ok for Al Gore to do what he did, since GWB has made it clear that he doesn't "care" either, right? I question the validity of your statement in regards to GWB, seems to me you may of gotten your misinformation via Michael Moore's "Farenhype" 9/11 film.<BR/><BR/>By the way, nice "assumption with attempted-justification" on your part to say that you're willing to bet I have family members like "that" as well.<BR/><BR/>Once again, the silence but excuses and justification from the left is present when someone like Al Gore stoops to the levels that he did. I can just see Maria and/or Dayvoe reporting this as fast as ever if a Republican did what Al Gore did. However, since a Democrat did it, well...it's just different, right? Shhh, we won't say anything, it's ok, really.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139945881776764762006-02-14T14:38:00.000-05:002006-02-14T14:38:00.000-05:00why would that surprise you. the bin liden family ...why would that surprise you. the bin liden family (huge) has been close to the movers and shakers in washington for years. i have people in my family that i am not like, bet you have or had as well.<BR/>president bush has made it quite clear that he hasn't any problem with the family OR the saudis, so...????Sherry Pasquarellohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06107407102753464356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139943245087419092006-02-14T13:54:00.000-05:002006-02-14T13:54:00.000-05:00This is a little off the subject per this blog pos...This is a little off the subject per this blog post, but I just have to bring it up anyway. Seems as if Al Gore was attending an event, sponsered by the Bin Laden family. I am curious as to where you guys stand on this.<BR/><BR/>http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/2/13/182926.shtml?s=icAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139930063464606772006-02-14T10:14:00.000-05:002006-02-14T10:14:00.000-05:00it's pretty plain who is in charge.mr. cheney can ...it's pretty plain who is in charge.<BR/>mr. cheney can operate by a different set of rules. he isn't really a political animal. he is big business with it's fingers firmly poking into government to further big business via laws, connections and loop holes. he isn't afraid of not being re- elected to anything, or his legacy as far as being vice president is concerned. to me, it seems he has his priorities in order according to his thoughts on it. he has secured his fortune for himself and his family and his friends for at least 2 generations, perhaps more.Sherry Pasquarellohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06107407102753464356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139924875025050692006-02-14T08:47:00.000-05:002006-02-14T08:47:00.000-05:00Look, I admit I laughed when I first read it, beca...Look, I admit I laughed when I first read it, because it just sounded so ridiculous. As Keith Olberman noted, it's the first vice president we know of since Aaron Burr who shot someone. Of course, it's much less funny to the 78-year-old man who was shot, and I'd like to think no one is actually glad that it happened. <BR/><BR/>But it is worth discussing further, because of what it reveals about how this administration operates. Case in point, this paragraph from a Washington Post article:<BR/><BR/>"The White House typically releases information immediately on incidents involving the president's personal life, such as bike-riding accidents, to avoid the appearance of covering up embarrassments. It is highly unusual, if not unprecedented, for the White House to allow a private citizen serve as its de facto spokesman.<BR/><BR/>But current and former aides said the White House rarely imposes its practices, especially on press matters, on Cheney. The vice president's office often operates autonomously in a manner that many top White House officials are reluctant to challenge."<BR/><BR/>So again, we have to ask of this administration, just who exactly is in charge?<BR/><BR/>(Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/13/AR2006021300452.html?referrer=email&referrer=email)Jonathan Pottshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18433924194960127561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139924011657349272006-02-14T08:33:00.000-05:002006-02-14T08:33:00.000-05:00To me it's a no brainer:Old men + rifles = bad ide...To me it's a no brainer:<BR/><BR/>Old men + rifles = bad idea, very bad idea.<BR/><BR/>And how come Cheney couldn't cough up the $7 for his hunting permit? Haven't we cut his taxes enough yet?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1139918110766909822006-02-14T06:55:00.000-05:002006-02-14T06:55:00.000-05:00Wow, it took you long enough, and secondly, I noti...Wow, it took you long enough, and secondly, I noticed that you took the story and commented on it like a spoiled little child, complete with the capitalized and boldface print more than twice . It was an accident, and I did comment via my own blog that anyone who cannot handle firearms safely, shouldn't handle firearms - that's how far I took it. You, on the other hand, you take it and go to "town" with it like you're almost "happy" it happened. You know, I can't help but wonder what you would say if this country were to get hit by terrorists again, all while you sit there and undermine this Administration's attempt at fighting it. Sheesh, Cheney accidentally discharged a firearm, and yes, as far as I am concerned he shouldn't be handling firearms. You almost seem to enjoy what happened because it was the Vice President that did it. C'mon, admit it, you know you're happy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com