tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post115016159503168933..comments2024-03-25T07:29:08.216-04:00Comments on 2 Political Junkies: Ruth Ann Dailey A Follow-upMariahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10439330154875628083noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1150340036867179242006-06-14T22:53:00.000-04:002006-06-14T22:53:00.000-04:00Ah - our brave troll responds. Ladies and gentleme...Ah - our brave troll responds. <BR/><BR/>Ladies and gentlemen - more proof that he is, unfortunately, stuck at the wrong end of a rhetorical cul de sac. And I don't think he can figure a way out.<BR/><BR/>If you happen to take the time to investigate what he's written in these comments throughout this blog, you'll notice an definite lack of variation in his collective responses.<BR/><BR/>When faced with someone who disagrees with his particularly jaundiced point of view, he inevitably shouts "intolerance!" to remind us, I gather, that we should be automatically agreeing with him in order to show the proper level of "diversity of opinion" that only he thinks should be here. <BR/><BR/>And if the disagreement continues, as it always will, he shouts "hypocrisy!" for the exact same reason.<BR/><BR/>And if you should happen to pin him down on something - he merely changes the subject.<BR/><BR/>It's not a reasoned debate by any means. But a reasoned debate is not what he wants. He wants an outburst so he can then claim something that validates his insanely narrow worldview - that liberals are all the same and that we hate everything.<BR/><BR/>It's a typical brain-dead right-wing response. There's not much intelligence behind it so there's not much reason to respond to it.<BR/><BR/>Don't get me wrong, there are certainly thoughtful, nuanced, intelligent conservatives around (and to be sure we'd welcome their input in this forum) but our troll is neither thoughtful nor nuanced nor intelligent.<BR/><BR/>So, ladies and gentlemen, there you have it. If you want to tussle with the troll, feel free. Now you know what you sort of "argument" you'll get if/when you do it.Dayvoehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06971560627535402858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1150335157067411862006-06-14T21:32:00.000-04:002006-06-14T21:32:00.000-04:00Dayvoe:Curious...you say, "it doesn't deserve a re...Dayvoe:<BR/><BR/>Curious...you say, "it doesn't deserve a response.." and yet you took the time in order to justify you intolerance. Speaking of prejudices, you might want to take a long, hard look in the mirror...considering you associate everything on the right with being prejudice, hateful, as well as classifying it as "typical conservative rhetorical garbage."<BR/><BR/>You had nothing to say in response to my previous comment with the exception of shooting your mouth off in typical liberal, "so called tolerant" hateful behavior.<BR/><BR/>Dude, seriously...you're a hypocrite and you know it. It's proven by the absolute hateful response you just gave. What is a matter? Nothing intelligent to say? <BR/><BR/>Not worth responding to, and yet you do? Man, you are totally messed up in the head. Get in touch with reality, son.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1150324051987428762006-06-14T18:27:00.000-04:002006-06-14T18:27:00.000-04:00Ladies and gentlemen;No need to worry. Our troll ...Ladies and gentlemen;<BR/><BR/>No need to worry. Our troll is back and he's spouting the typical braindead conservative garbage - it doesn't deserve a response. <BR/><BR/>Notice how our troll looks to equate "progressive" with "a group who hates this country, hates what it was founded upon, and hates capitalism" with no evidence other than his own ignorant prejudices.<BR/><BR/>He's talking straight out his asshole for some time now and he's got nothing tangible to base all that crap on.<BR/><BR/>Typical conservative rhetorical garbage. It's not even interesting.<BR/><BR/>And, of course, our troll looks like a complete idiot whenever he attempts this argument.<BR/><BR/>A complete idiot - no need to respond.Dayvoehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06971560627535402858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1150286219629838132006-06-14T07:56:00.000-04:002006-06-14T07:56:00.000-04:00"Progressive" blog = liberal, marxist blog. Anyti..."Progressive" blog = liberal, marxist blog. Anytime I hear the word "progressive" when it comes to liberals and Democrats, you can be rest assured that they are a group who hates this country, hates what it was founded upon, and hates capitalism.<BR/><BR/>Speaking of "illegitimate" wars:<BR/><BR/>I guess taking out a evil, ruthless dictator who killed countless numbers of his very own people, tortured parents in front of their children, as well as harboring terrorists makes it all illegitimate, huh? On top of that, I guess having three elections in 1 year as well as a newly installed administration doesn’t count as an achievement either.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1150285845915785102006-06-14T07:50:00.000-04:002006-06-14T07:50:00.000-04:00anonymous...please, save your links for some whack...anonymous...please, save your links for some whacko nutjob who takes the huffington post seriously. <BR/><BR/>funny, you say "dubya" could of gotten al zarqawi years ago when Clinton could of gotten the ultimate mastermind of 9/11 during his administration, then you make excuses for him by pointing me to the huffington post...a site who has about as much credibility as you demonstrate liberal tolerance. Enough said.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1150218248008562872006-06-13T13:04:00.000-04:002006-06-13T13:04:00.000-04:00it sounds to me as if you are almost pissed that a...<I>it sounds to me as if you are almost pissed that al-Zarqawi was killed. As I predicted, the liberal left is bitching about it.</I><BR/><BR/>Yeah. We're bitching about the fact that Dubya could have taken out Zarqawi three years ago but decided not to because it would have weakened his bogus case for going to war against Iraq. As to the death of Zarqawi himself--every progressive blog that has commented on it has basically said the same thing, "Good riddance".<BR/><BR/><I>Speaking of "missings," I find it curious that you fail to mention how the Clinton administration let the big daddy of them all go...Bin Laden. No comment? Of course not.</I><BR/><BR/>You are as careless with your facts as Ruth Ann Dailey. The whole "Clinton could have gotten Bin Laden" myth was debunked years ago. See <A HREF="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nellie-b/nyt-wags-the-dog_b_5855.html" REL="nofollow">here</A> for starters.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8213262.post-1150199267948843912006-06-13T07:47:00.000-04:002006-06-13T07:47:00.000-04:00dayvoe:it sounds to me as if you are almost pissed...dayvoe:<BR/><BR/>it sounds to me as if you are almost pissed that al-Zarqawi was killed. As I predicted, the liberal left is bitching about it. Speaking of "missings," I find it curious that you fail to mention how the Clinton administration let the big daddy of them all go...Bin Laden. No comment? Of course not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com