Are you willing to accept the opinions of three Nobel prize winners in economics (or are they dispensing KoolAid too)? If two of them (because Paul Samuelson is dead) say the Paul Ryan budget (endorsed by Romeny) will not solve our unemployment problems, and in fact make things worse, do you reject the opinions of "so-called experts" as the Tea Party puts it?
@Ed.. Go ahead and keep beating that "It's Bush's fault" dead horse. The simple fact is that certain policies of the Barack Hussein Obama (a/k/a "The Kenyan Mooslim") administration have MORE than contributed to the problem.
The unemployment rate is WAY more worse than 8%.
Get your head out of your *** and at least admit that Keynesian (sp?) policies expoused by the administration have been wrong... not just wrong, but 'EFFIN WRONG.
Oh, just because someone wins a Nobel Prize doesn't necessarily mean they're an expert in their field of expertise or activity/accomplishment for which they were awarded a Nobel prize. (See Obama, Nobel Peace prize. LMAO.)
CM, so you are saying that the financial collapse did not occur on Bush's watch?
I didn't bring up unemployment, JimboBillyBob did. Are you going to treat him to one of your deliberate math errors you will refuse to admit until months later when you call it a typo? I mean, economists know how unemployment is calculated, but they treat it the same way for white Presidents and black Presidents. You are obviously no economist.
Maybe just because someone wins a Nobel Prize in economics does not mean that you are willing to treat them with the respect they have earned in their field, but I know for sure they are smarter than you.
The stimulus was too small, a combination of political calculation and Congressional negotiation. But, according to the CBO it still saved or created three million jobs. I realize you don't want to accept that, but that is the truth. I realize Republicans no longer are interested in the truth.
Tell us when austerity has worked in the past. Tell us how Ronald Reagan enforced austerity.
CM, the Obama's budget was rejected by Democrats because during the debt ceiling negotiations he had proposed something more ambitious, and Democrats did not want to undermine him by risking sending him his old proposed budget. But never mind, your simplistic explanation is a better sound bite. No reason why we should consider the truth (certainly you show no signs of interest in it).
7 comments:
41 months of unemployment above 8%.
And Mitt Romney is the problem?
Keep drinking that DNC Koolaid...
JbBB, who put us into the 41 months?
Are you willing to accept the opinions of three Nobel prize winners in economics (or are they dispensing KoolAid too)? If two of them (because Paul Samuelson is dead) say the Paul Ryan budget (endorsed by Romeny) will not solve our unemployment problems, and in fact make things worse, do you reject the opinions of "so-called experts" as the Tea Party puts it?
@Ed.. Go ahead and keep beating that "It's Bush's fault" dead horse. The simple fact is that certain policies of the Barack Hussein Obama (a/k/a "The Kenyan Mooslim") administration have MORE than contributed to the problem.
The unemployment rate is WAY more worse than 8%.
Get your head out of your *** and at least admit that Keynesian (sp?) policies expoused by the administration have been wrong... not just wrong, but 'EFFIN WRONG.
Oh, just because someone wins a Nobel Prize doesn't necessarily mean they're an expert in their field of expertise or activity/accomplishment for which they were awarded a Nobel prize. (See Obama, Nobel Peace prize. LMAO.)
What policies CM? Obama put forth an economic recovery plan. Republicans in congress refused to pass it. What plan have they put forth?
CM, so you are saying that the financial collapse did not occur on Bush's watch?
I didn't bring up unemployment, JimboBillyBob did. Are you going to treat him to one of your deliberate math errors you will refuse to admit until months later when you call it a typo? I mean, economists know how unemployment is calculated, but they treat it the same way for white Presidents and black Presidents. You are obviously no economist.
Maybe just because someone wins a Nobel Prize in economics does not mean that you are willing to treat them with the respect they have earned in their field, but I know for sure they are smarter than you.
The stimulus was too small, a combination of political calculation and Congressional negotiation. But, according to the CBO it still saved or created three million jobs. I realize you don't want to accept that, but that is the truth. I realize Republicans no longer are interested in the truth.
Tell us when austerity has worked in the past. Tell us how Ronald Reagan enforced austerity.
@Ol Froth..
Barack Hussein Obama put forth a Budget.. that went down 97-0 in the Senate and Everyone-0 in House.
Nice try. Please choose a prize from the bottom row.
CM, the Obama's budget was rejected by Democrats because during the debt ceiling negotiations he had proposed something more ambitious, and Democrats did not want to undermine him by risking sending him his old proposed budget. But never mind, your simplistic explanation is a better sound bite. No reason why we should consider the truth (certainly you show no signs of interest in it).
Post a Comment