April 9, 2007

More Evidence of White House Incompetence

This time it's the Rudy Giuliani-Bernard Kerik-Alberto Gonzales network of incompetence.

From the New York Times:

When former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani urged President Bush to make Bernard B. Kerik the next secretary of homeland security, White House aides knew Kerik as the take-charge top cop from Sept. 11, 2001. But it did not take them long to compile an extensive dossier of damaging information about the would-be Cabinet officer.

They learned about questionable financial deals, an ethics violation, allegations of mismanagement and a top deputy prosecuted for corruption. Most disturbing, according to people close to the process, was Kerik's friendship with a businessman who was linked to organized crime. The businessman had told federal authorities that Kerik received gifts, including $165,000 in apartment renovations, from a New Jersey family with alleged Mafia ties.

Alarmed about the raft of allegations, several White House aides tried to raise red flags. But the normal investigation process was short-circuited, the sources said. Bush's top lawyer, Alberto R. Gonzales, took charge of the vetting, repeatedly grilling Kerik about the issues that had been raised. In the end, despite the concerns, the White House moved forward with his nomination -- only to have it collapse a week later. [Emphasis added]

You just gotta love that finely tuned, fiercely exercised ethical radar they got over there in dubya's White House, huh?

Then there's this:
A reconstruction of the failed nomination, assembled through interviews with key players, provides new details and a fuller account of the episode -- how Giuliani put forward a flawed candidate for high office, how Bush rushed the usual process in his eagerness to install a political ally and how Gonzales, as White House counsel, failed to stop the nomination despite the many warning signs. "The vetting process clearly broke down," said a senior White House official. "This should not happen." [Emphasis added
My god, who would've thought that the White House would have stepped over "the usual process" in order to install a political ally in a hugely important position? Anyone? Anyone?

But just as there's always room for jello, there's always room for the White House to lie about their decisions:
The White House explanation has shifted significantly. Just after Kerik withdrew, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said that "we have no reason to believe" he lied and that it "would be an inaccurate impression" to say the vetting was rushed. Now current and former White House officials assert that Kerik lied "bald-faced," as one put it, and say they erred by speeding up the nomination.
I don't really need to comment on that, do I?

Is there anyone in the White House who isn't completely corruptly incompentent?

6 comments:

  1. This WH has its perfect analog in the halls of corporate America. Every decision is based on the needs and desires of the VP/Golfers at the top of the ladder, to the exclusion of absoluutely everyone else....

    Piltdown Man

    ReplyDelete
  2. pretty much.

    i thought there would never be another attempt at an imperial white house, a military-industrial beast like the nixon whitehouse during my lifetime.

    i was wrong.
    we have very short memories.

    and still chose to believe lies that soothe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bernie K: another reason why Giuliani should never be President.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The White House Follies remind me of the old joke about the guy who's trying to moderate his beer drinking by limiting himself to one a day. "This beer [scandal]," he points out, "is for July 23, 2018."

    See, it's not that they're unduly corrupt. They're just waaaaaay ahead of schedule.

    ReplyDelete
  5. that's a good one. i've never heard that before!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks. When you've been around as long as I have, there are a lot of oldie moldies of various pedigrees chasing around the interior of your cranium. Remembering punchlines, however, is sometimes a bit of a challenge.

    ReplyDelete