Wendy Bell Challenges The Fact Checkers (Spoilers: She's Misleading. Again)

Ok, Wendy. Let's do this.

When the nice white lady sheltered in her basement "studio" isn't Karen-lecturing America about race, she's usually misleading her rabid fanbase about the coronavirus (the "fake" numbers, the "dangerous" vaccine, whatever).

Yesterday was no different.  On her Facebook page, Wendy went with this:

I wonder if I am among the "esteemed." Goshers I hope so! I mean, just take a look at how she describes her BS Bullshit boards - "chock full of information" (well get to that in a minute). Does it remind you of anything? Any thing recent?  

 Only three long/short days ago I posted this:

Yesterday, The Angel of Death posted not one but two BS boards Chock full o' Nutzy misinformation. 

Hey, Wendy. Nice to see you. Sit down. Have some coffee. I'm glad you're so enamored of my little blog that you're subconsciously quoting it. 

Here's the thing. You're still misusing the VAERS data. FB tells you this every time you do it.

Like here:

If you were to click on that "See Why" link you'd get these two corrections:

• Fact Check: CDC's VAERS 'Reports' Are NOT Solid Proof of Vaccine Injuries Or Deaths -- Just Starting Point for CDC, FDA Investigators
• VAERS reports of adverse events in people who received COVID-19 vaccines don’t demonstrate that these events were caused by the vaccines; evidence does not indicate COVID-19 vaccines caused Bell’s palsy and deaths 

I even told you this three weeks ago. ICYMI, this is from the CDC's own disclaimer for the VAERS data:

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to VAERS. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind. [Emphasis added.]

See the sentences that are in italicized bold, Wendy? Yea, that's what you always fail to do.

And face it, Wendy, without that VAERS data, you got bupkes.

If I get the chance tonight, I'll take you to school on the first Bullshit board.