We don't have to go far into Wendy's discussion about VAERS to see her duplicity.
About 1:23:17 in we hear Wendy say:
So the CDC's VAERS website, the VAERS pages, the "Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System" is really very illuminating.
Though it's shocking that a Stanford Study many years ago discovered that only between one in nine percent of all adverse events or one in ten percent are actually reported.
It is a grossly under-reported figure.
So you can only imagine if we say ten adverse events, the number could be as high as one hundred, could be higher than that.
Truly, it's dizzying if you think about it.
But this rush to vaccinate children is really a rush to find a blank check to big pharma.
So you've got twenty-eight million school kids between the ages of five and and twelve who are now in that new bucket that the greedy among us want to basically syringe.
Even though we know that they're 99.998% likely to survive a Covid infection, OK?
Two points here. About that "that only between one in nine percent of all adverse events or one in ten percent are actually reported" part - that's misleading.
And it's misleading because Wendy always omits the VAERS disclaimer:
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
There's more to the disclaimer but you get the gist.
The VAERS data is not intended to be complete or comprehensive. It's the first place investigators would go to see if there are any patterns of events, not a complete assessment of those events.
Anytime Wendy Bell talks about the VAERS numbers without mentioning the disclaimer, she's misleading her public.
Now onto that second percentage.
She says that there are 28,000,000 kids between five and twelve and that they're 99.998% "likely to survive a Covid infection."
Now do the math. Assuming her numbers are accurate (yea, I know) that still means that Wendy Bell is OK with the estimated deaths of 560 school kids between five and twelve.
Wendy Bell, The Angel of Death.