April 11, 2007

Reform Pittsburgh Now

This evening, in the rooms where his mayoral campaign once hummed along and then shut itself down, Bill Peduto began an interesting political experiment. Using the network he has leftover from that campaign he's looking to kick start another local political movement - Reform Pittsburgh Now!

Clad casually (see picture), he began the meeting with a brief summary of the reasons he unplugged his run for the Mayor's office. He said he would have lost, and lost big. The loss would have damaged any chance of further reform in this city. The only way to level the playing field against Luke Ravenstahl's huge poll numbers was to go negative - big time. But going negative would inevitably have alienated his supporters and so on.

Peduto reiterated just how big Ravenstahl's poll numbers were with a joke (now safe to tell, he said, as it's no longer Holy Week). Peduto said that if Jesus himself were running in this campaign not only would Luke still win big, but he'd get the carpenter's union endorsement to boot.

Forgive me but it took me a few minutes to get the carpenter's union joke.

He went on to say that there's an odd mindset in the city. People are tired of business as usual, HOWEVER they see the solution to business as usual as Luke Ravenstahl.

So what was the meeting for? He's looking to have Pittsburgh's progressive community have a greater hand in setting the agenda for reforming city politics. The crowd of about 75 was faced with 10 or so desks, each with a sheet of paper taped to it. Handwritten on each sheet of paper was a policy issue - Economic Development, Education, Art/Technology and so on.

Everyone was then invited to head over to the policy group with which they were most comfortable and start brainstorming. The plan was to have a set of reform policies in place by the end of the month of May. At that point, Peduto would then begin to present them, one by one, to City Council. Within a few minutes each table had some sort of crowd around it, though of the ten or so tables there, most of the buzz seemed to be happening around the Economic Development, Transit, and Public Safety tables.

I guess that's what's on people's minds.

Peduto said while he was happy with the showing tonight, he's looking to expand the group to possibly 600 by the end of the year. It'll be made up of people interested in policy, but not necessarily politics.

When I asked him HIS place in the group, he said he's the voice. When the agenda is set, his seat at City Council will be the access point for the reform group into city politics. The existence of the group, he said "is to show other elected officials that it's safe to jump into water."

Earlier in the evening, when commenting on why it's important to have such an organization pushing a reform agenda, he said, "If we don't do it, no one's going to."

Two More Events

I saw these after I posted my last list.

Morton Mintz: Business Sense, Common Sense and Health Care
WHAT: Lecture on Health Care
WHEN: Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 3:30 PM - 5:30 PM TODAY!
WHERE: 2315 Doherty Hall, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA

Award-winning journalist and investigative reporter for the Washington Post, Morton Mintz is one of America’s watchdogs. His article “Single-Payer: Good for Business,” published in November 2004’s The Nation, makes a convincing case for a health care system to benefit all Americans. Hear Mintz discuss this pivotal issue that impacts everyone from employees to business owners. Find out how he proposes to ease the struggles of families and businesses by solving the problem of expensive health care. Sponsored by Catalyst Connection.

Free

RSVP: 412.918.4229 or events@pghtech.org

An Evening with Evan Wolfson, author of Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People’s Right to Marry
WHAT: WOMEN’ S RIGHTS SEMINAR SERIES
WHEN: Thursday, April 19, 2007 6:30 pm (Wine & Hors d’oeuvres Reception), 7:00 pm Presentation and Q&A
WHERE: Kelly-Strayhorn Theater, 5941 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206

The Women’s Law Project and Persad Center present An Evening with Evan Wolfson, author of Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People’s Right to Marry.

FREE & OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
(CLE credit available through the Women’s Bar Association of Western PA $15 for one hour of substantive CLE credit, payable to WBA at door.)

Cosponsors (partial list):
ACLU Greater Pittsburgh, Democracy for Pittsburgh, Equality Advocates Pennsylvania, Feminist Law Forum, University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Gay & Lesbian Community Center of Pittsburgh, Marriage Equality USA (Southwest PA), New Voices Pittsburgh: Women of Color for Reproductive Justice, One Church, People of Color Center, PFLAG Pittsburgh, PA League of Young Voters, Steel City Stonewall Democrats, Value All Families Coalition, Women & Girls Foundation of Southwestern PA

RSVP: 412-227-0301 or treynolds@womenslawproject.org

Councilwoman Carlisle to be arraigned on multiple criminal charges today

Now we know why Pittsburgh Councilwoman Twanda Carlisle hired a lawyer yesterday: she's being arraigned in Brookline today at 10:00 AM.

The charges include:
  • Theft by conspiracy
  • Criminal conspiracy
  • Violations of the state Ethics Act
  • Election Code violations
  • Failure to file required financial disclosures
  • From the Post-Gazette:
    An affidavit filed by Detective William Miller of the Allegheny County District Attorney's office indicates that on 50 occasions, Ms. Carlisle made cash deposits into her personal bank account at Dollar Bank within one day of one of the consultants cashing a city check.
    Ms. Carlisle faces seven challengers for her Council seat in May.

    The Trib covers it here. (Short) video at KDKA TV here.

    The Pelosi Smearing Continues

    Even into the next election cycle.

    I caught a little of Ron Francis last night on the Pintek-Hosted NightTalk. Francis is a former county councilman and is looking to challenge Congressman Jason Altmire for the Pennsylvania 4th Congressional district seat.

    Anyway, back to the Pintek hour. They dutifully parrotted the RNC line about the recent trip by Speaker Pelosi to the mid-East. She shouldn't have gone. She shouldn't be meddling in foreign affairs. Blah-blah-blah.

    Let's bring some facts to the table. For all the outrage from the right about how a Speaker of the House of Representatives shouldn't be doing any foreign policy, no one from God's Own Party (and by the way the day before Mike Pintek declared the a few things on his show; that he knew the mind of God and that the Democrats are, indeed, "anti-God") seems to remember when Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich travelled all the way to China to deliver a message contrary to the Clinton Administration's foreign policy.

    From the New York Times, March 31, 1997 and via Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com:

    Speaking with startling bluntness on an issue so delicate that diplomats have tiptoed around it for years, Newt Gingrich said today that he had warned China's top leaders that the United States would intervene militarily if Taiwan was attacked.

    As he left for Tokyo after a three-day trip to China, Mr. Gingrich said he had made it absolutely clear how the United States would respond if such a military conflict arose.

    Referring to his meetings with China's leaders, Mr. Gingrich said: ''I said firmly, 'We want you to understand, we will defend Taiwan. Period.'"

    He also said, ''I think that they are more aware now that we would defend Taiwan if it were militarily attacked.''

    Which led, according to Greenwald, to this a few days later in the Times:

    China admonished the United States today to speak with one voice on foreign policy and accused Newt Gingrich of making ''improper'' statements on Washington's commitment to defend Taiwan from any military attack by the mainland.

    The criticism was made by the Foreign Ministry spokesman, Shen Guofang, who earlier this week had expressed basic satisfaction with remarks made by Mr. Gingrich, the Speaker of the House, during a three-day visit to China.

    The visit followed Vice President Al Gore's first trip to Beijing. Both men spoke on issues of contention between Washington and Beijing, but Mr. Gingrich's remarks were noteworthy for their directness and for exceeding the normal State Department formulations on American commitments to Taiwan.

    Unmentioned, of course, by either Pintek or Francis. The political double standard on the right continues.

    April 10, 2007

    Patrick Dowd - Candidate for City Council

    I got a chance late last week to chat with another candidate for Pittsburgh public office. This time it was Patrick Dowd. He's running for City Council-District 7.

    I started the chat with the same question I start all my candidate chats, "How's the campaign going?"

    "Pretty exciting, so far." he said. And we were off. By the end of the campaign, he said he's planning on knocking on 9,000 doors. Ouch.

    From the beginning of the interview, Dowd took (for me at least) a unique approach to answer the question "what ails the city of Pittbsurgh?" For him, the biggest issue facing the city is its population loss. That's the main issue he's looking to address and it's from that problem most of the city's other problems (tax revenue, urban renewal and so on) flow. Coincidentally, this came the same day it was reported in the P-G that:
    The Pittsburgh region has lost more residents since 2000 than any U.S. metropolitan area except New Orleans, but there's no hurricane responsible for it dropping 60,309 people.
    Dowd's general plan (and this is in the broadest sense) is to build a city that will be more attractive - more attractive so that young people will stick around AND non-Pittsburghers will want to move here and then stick around.

    In order to do that, for example, the problem of the city's 15,000 vacant and abandoned houses will have to be solved. The problem here, he said, was the drain these houses placed on their neighborhoods. "People worry" about what's going on in them. They're a sign of decline as well.

    He's looking to solve it via tax incentives for people to reinvest in those houses, rather than boarding them up and tearing them down. He's looking for a way to boost property values - this leads back, for Dowd, to his idea of building up an attractive city people won't want to leave.

    Another issue, public transportation, also plays into Dowd's general plans. He's less than satisfied with the City Council's work on this issue. He says they've "done nothing" for Pittsburgh public transportation.

    When I asked whether it's in fact the council's responsibility, considering the bus system is county-wide rather than city-wide, he answered that while that's true the system is county wide, the City Council could be a bully pulpit for city residents in this matter. It could be pushing for a restructuring of the system, driving for change on public transportation. The city, he said, is the hub of the region , the majority of those taking public transportation are city residents - so it is a council responsibility. Dowd added that there are legislative tools available to the council and they should use them.

    In the face of public transport cuts "what has the City Council done?" he asked rhetorically. "Nothing." he answered back.

    In terms of the functioning of city government, he's looking for a greater transparency (for example in terms of the City Council's discretionary spending) and a greater reliance on solid data from which any city program would grow. He said he'd start by finding out exactly what the city is doing - how many manhole covers does it have? How many does it replace in a given year, that sort of thing - in order to better utilize the city's resources.

    Throughout our chat, he emphasized his ability to form broad coalitions around issues rather than labels. He's looking to find the middle of the city council, and build a coalition there around anyone willing to work seriously about the issues facing the city.

    The Ravenstahl tip

    Just wanted to reblog on the tip we'd received lastnight.

    I got a tip (a text message on my phone, actually) that there was something of a shakeup over at Ravenstahl campaign HQ. This was news to me. I hadn't heard anything about it. I checked around to some other sources and no one had heard anything about anything. As I didn't have much of any context for the tip, I wasn't comfortable posting what I'd heard - only that I'd heard something.

    Late last night (or very early this morning) my source e-mailed me back to say that the Mayor had let everyone of his campaign staff go except a skeleton field crew and the finance director. There wasn't much point in spending the amount of money they were spending.

    I'm still trying to track down more details.

    That's all I know.

    Any further info would be greatly appreciated. E-mail me at numbah_6@yahoo.com

    -DAYVOE

    Reminder Announcement

    I'll be on OffQ this Friday, the 13th.

    The weird thing is that the picture they're using:

    Doesn't really look like me any more as I shaved the beard about a year ago. But I'll be on in a suit and tie, sitting next to my good friend Fred Honsberger.

    Another USAttorney Wrinkle (with a local connection)

    Here's an interesting wrinkle to the USAttorney story. It's in the Washington Post.

    You remember the story, right? There was a buncha USAttorneys who were effectively fired for not being loyal enough to the Bush Administration's political policies. They were replaced by less qualified, more loyal Bushies and because of a little known prevision quietly slipped into the USAPatriot Act, the replacements did not need to be OKed by the Senate.

    Well one of those replaced, David C. Iglesias USAttorney of New Mexico, was reportedly replaced for not being at his office enough. From the Post:
    One of them, David C. Iglesias of New Mexico, was publicly accused by the Justice Department of being an "absentee landlord" who was away from his job too much.
    Iglesias himself has protested this. You know why
    Iglesias filed a complaint with federal investigators last week, alleging that his dismissal amounted to discrimination based on his status as an officer in the Navy Reserve, which took him away from the job for 40 to 45 days a year. Alleged absenteeism has been the Justice Department's main public criticism of Iglesias, although officials have more recently added concerns about his handling of voter fraud and immigration cases to their arguments about him.
    Ok, so that's the set-up. The point of the Post article is that there've been a number of USAttorneys (including our own Mary Beth Buchanan) who have been given double appointments:
    A half-dozen sitting U.S. attorneys also serve as aides to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales or are assigned other Washington postings, performing tasks that take them away from regular duties in their districts for months or even years at a time, according to officials and department records.
    And a few paragraphs down:
    The number of U.S. attorneys pulling double duty in Washington is the focus of growing concern from other prosecutors and from members of the federal bench, according to legal experts and government officials.
    Our own Mary Beth Buchanan is pulling double duty as well, serving as the acting director of the Office of Violence Against Women.

    So they toss the merely loyal USAttorney for spending too much time in the Naval Reserve, while keeping other more "loyal Bushies" in their positions.

    Can they get any more disgusting?

    EVENTS

    Reform Pittsburgh NOW!
    WHAT:
    You are Invited to a Policy Party! (w/ People for Peduto)
    WHEN: Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 6:00 - 8:00 PM
    WHERE: People for Peduto Headquarters, 201 South Highland Avenue, Suite 203, Pittsburgh PA 15206

    Join with other Pittsburghers to Reform Pittsburgh NOW!

    In the past, People for Peduto was looking for your time and $$$ -- now, they want your IDEAS.

    Let your voice be heard! SHARE policy ideas, best practice models, research (they encourage you to donate photocopied materials). COMMIT to an issue and join with others to formulate sound policy. BUILD a movement of progressive ideas.

    Refreshments provided

    RSVP to Danae at 412-363-2909 or email danae@billpeduto.com

    2007 Write-A-Thon for Human Rights
    WHAT:
    Amnesty International Pittsburgh's Write-A-Thon
    WHEN: Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 6:30 PM.- 9:30 PM
    WHERE: Calvary Episcopal Church (315 Shady Avenue), Pittsburgh, PA

    Write letters to authorities involved or connected with human rights issues; in furtherance of the rights of the victims.

    Candle lighting ceremony, 8:00 p.m

    More info at http://www.amnestypgh.org

    Together we can! Meet & Greet with Patrick Dowd
    WHAT:
    Meet & Greet with Patrick Dowd
    WHEN: Thursday, April 12, 2007, 5:00 PM
    WHERE: Upstairs at Lot 17, 4617 Liberty Ave, Pittsburgh, PA

    Join in for a happy hour with Patrick Dowd, candidate for Pittsburgh City Council District 7.

    The campaign is focused on reforming our government, reinvesting in our neighborhoods, and promoting the great (and green!) potential of our city.

    Snacks & cash bar to be provided. Please consider a contribution of $20, $40 and beyond! Your support counts and is greatly appreciated.

    Contributions will be accepted at the event, or can be submitted online at www.dowdforpittsburgh.org

    RSVP @ Campaign HQ - (412) 403-9295 or online @
    http://www.evite.com/pages/invite/viewInvite.jsp?inviteId=CJZTKJYXTFGUAVFKVGPP&li=iq&src=email&trk=aei3

    The Great Healthcare Debate of Pennsylvania Leadership Action Conference
    WHAT: Help Fund PA Single Payor Healthcare Debate
    WHEN: Friday, April 13th, 2007, 10:00 AM to 3:00 PM
    WHERE: Kearns Spirituality Center (Pittsburgh), 9000 Babcock Blvd., Allison Park, PA 15101

    The movement for single payer health care in Pennsylvania and nationally is diffuse and diverse -- which is what the allies of our broken status quo count on. We're convening this, the sixth Action Conference, to solidify leader-to-leader communication, synch our mutual health care agendas, and coordinate the fight ahead. Leaders and representatives of all groups working on health care reform are welcome.

    Proponents of the Governor’s private insurance based “Prescription for Pennsylvania” (HB 700) will debate supporters the public health trust single payer based “Family & Business Health Care Security Act” (SB 300).

    Lunch: $7.50 (regular and vegetarian), though you are welcome to bring your own. Refreshments provided.

    RSVP: Please confirm your attendance @ http://www.helpfundpa.org/evt04-13.htm

    Rally on the River
    WHAT: Rally on the River for Global Warming Solutions
    WHEN: Saturday, April 14, 2007: Rally and Picnic: 11:00 AM-1:00 PM; Action! Walk: 1:00 PM -3:00 PM
    WHERE: The Historic Homestead Pump House, E. Waterfront Drive - Munhall, PA (just east of The Waterfront)

    Join the Blue-Green Alliance, Sierra Club, and United Steelworkers for live music, speakers, food, door prizes, and activities for kids and adults. AND they're collecting used batteries, compact fluorescent light bulbs, and cell phones for recycling.

    For more information: 412.802.6161

    14th Ward Independent Democratic Club Fundraiser
    WHAT:
    Annual Fundraiser Event
    WHEN: Saturday, April 14, at 7:30 PM
    WHERE: Minadeo Elementary School, 6502 Lilac St., Pittsburgh, PA 15217

    OBIE-Award winning Actor, Playwright and Correspondent from The Daily Show, Aasif Mandvi, is their featured performer at this year’s fundraiser event. He will perform excerpts from his new solo show, The Adventures of the Curry Pot Cowboy.

    Plus, the political humor of John McIntire and Gab Bonesso.

    ORDER YOUR TICKETS NOW! Seating is limited. More info at http://www.pgh14widc.org/Welcome.html

    April 9, 2007

    DEVELOPING

    DEVELOPING: We received a tip that there may be some interesting news about the Ravenstahl campaign coming out tonight.

    I don't want to give out too much info as it's still unconfirmed.

    I'll update you on whatever I learn.

    -DAYVOE

    Update 10:06pm: Haven't heard anything back, sorry folks. I put in an e-mail to the Mayor's campaign (via the contact page at his campaign website) asking for a confirmation, just to be sure.

    I'm pretty confident in my source - but as I don't have enough context I'm not yet comfortable posting my tip. But if anyone has any information about anything new happening in the inner circle of Luke Ravenstahl's campaign HQ, please drop me a line. Confidentiality is assured.

    Update Tuesday 2:02am: Ok, here's what I got. My source tells me that Mayor Ravenstahl is letting everyone on his campaign go except for a skeleton field staff and finance director. The decision was apparently a financial one, my source adding "no sense in spending the money he was spending."

    For what it's worth, that's what I got.

    Developing...

    Funniest Easter Post from the Burghosphere

    Those T&A dudes give us "Bunnorato."

    More Evidence of White House Incompetence

    This time it's the Rudy Giuliani-Bernard Kerik-Alberto Gonzales network of incompetence.

    From the New York Times:

    When former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani urged President Bush to make Bernard B. Kerik the next secretary of homeland security, White House aides knew Kerik as the take-charge top cop from Sept. 11, 2001. But it did not take them long to compile an extensive dossier of damaging information about the would-be Cabinet officer.

    They learned about questionable financial deals, an ethics violation, allegations of mismanagement and a top deputy prosecuted for corruption. Most disturbing, according to people close to the process, was Kerik's friendship with a businessman who was linked to organized crime. The businessman had told federal authorities that Kerik received gifts, including $165,000 in apartment renovations, from a New Jersey family with alleged Mafia ties.

    Alarmed about the raft of allegations, several White House aides tried to raise red flags. But the normal investigation process was short-circuited, the sources said. Bush's top lawyer, Alberto R. Gonzales, took charge of the vetting, repeatedly grilling Kerik about the issues that had been raised. In the end, despite the concerns, the White House moved forward with his nomination -- only to have it collapse a week later. [Emphasis added]

    You just gotta love that finely tuned, fiercely exercised ethical radar they got over there in dubya's White House, huh?

    Then there's this:
    A reconstruction of the failed nomination, assembled through interviews with key players, provides new details and a fuller account of the episode -- how Giuliani put forward a flawed candidate for high office, how Bush rushed the usual process in his eagerness to install a political ally and how Gonzales, as White House counsel, failed to stop the nomination despite the many warning signs. "The vetting process clearly broke down," said a senior White House official. "This should not happen." [Emphasis added
    My god, who would've thought that the White House would have stepped over "the usual process" in order to install a political ally in a hugely important position? Anyone? Anyone?

    But just as there's always room for jello, there's always room for the White House to lie about their decisions:
    The White House explanation has shifted significantly. Just after Kerik withdrew, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said that "we have no reason to believe" he lied and that it "would be an inaccurate impression" to say the vetting was rushed. Now current and former White House officials assert that Kerik lied "bald-faced," as one put it, and say they erred by speeding up the nomination.
    I don't really need to comment on that, do I?

    Is there anyone in the White House who isn't completely corruptly incompentent?

    Another Pelosi Myth

    Recently, I caught a few minutes of Fox "News" watcher Mike Pintek guest-hosting on John McIntire's old show over at PCNC.

    For what it's worth McIntire's back on the radio these days at 93.7, The Zone. He and Wolverine-fan Gab Bonesso can be heard daily doing bits like "Johnny Mac, Lesbo-flipper" and "Gab Bonesso, bad phone sex operator." Give it a listen if you like. Some are appalled, some are entertained. Some are at work and can't listen to it anyway.

    Anyway back to the political bloggery.

    If there's any more evidence that Pintek's been drinking the conservative cool-aid, this is it. He's been parroting the RNC talking point that Speaker Pelosi blundered on that recent trip to the Middle East. If you look closely, you can actually see the panic-based spittle when Pintek's forced to pinch out those two words: "Speaker Pelosi."

    The "blunder" was something about her claiming to be bringing a message from Israel, and the Israeli Prime Minister claiming otherwise.

    Josh Marshall has the story. Unlike the political construction the wingnuts inhabit, reality is far far more complicated. Marshall's piece is based in part on this article from Haaretz.com. In it, you'll find these two paragraphs:

    Following his visit to the forces in the field, a decision was made to publicly address the concerns of a possible deterioration with the Syrians, and to send a message that Israel has no intention of attacking Syria, nor is there any coordinated plan with the U.S. for a joint attack against Iran.

    The speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, is scheduled to meet with Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus today, and will deliver a message of calm from Israel.

    So much for Pintek's RNC talking points.

    As I wrote, the real story is a lot more complicated than Pintek or the Washington Post editorial thinks.

    April 8, 2007

    Are British Schools REALLY Dropping Holocaust Studies?.

    In today's column by our good friend and resident rightwing nutjob Jack Kelly, I was stuck something in the 11th paragraph:
    This extent to which liberals are willing to accept inferior status to Muslims even in their own countries is mind-boggling. In Britain, schools are dropping references to the Holocaust to avoid offending Muslims, the Daily Mail reported.
    It stuck out somehow. Is it really possible that in land of Oxford and Cambridge, they're actually dropping Holocaust classes for teenagers? I decided to hunt it down (something Jack should have done his own damn self).

    Here's the article. By the way, the Daily Mail is a conservative tabloid newspaper in the UK - think the New York Post but with an English accent. If you read the article (again, Jack you really should have done this before submitting your column for publication) you'll see this:

    Schools are dropping the Holocaust from history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils, a Governmentbacked study has revealed.

    It found some teachers are reluctant to cover the atrocity for fear of upsetting students whose beliefs include Holocaust denial.

    See that? It switched from "Schools..." in the first paragraph to "Some teachers..." in the second. Already, we've moved away from a government mandated restriction, haven't we? And what of this study?

    The study, funded by the Department for Education and Skills, looked into 'emotive and controversial' history teaching in primary and secondary schools.

    It found some teachers are dropping courses covering the Holocaust at the earliest opportunity over fears Muslim pupils might express anti-Semitic and anti-Israel reactions in class.

    Again, "some teachers." Hardly nationwide.

    So how many examples does the Daily Mail article site? Three. Here they are.
    1 - The researchers gave the example of a secondary school in an unnamed northern city, which dropped the Holocaust as a subject for GCSE coursework.

    2 - It added: "In another department, the Holocaust was taught despite anti-Semitic sentiment among some pupils.

    "But the same department deliberately avoided teaching the Crusades at Key Stage 3 (11- to 14-year-olds) because their balanced treatment of the topic would have challenged what was taught in some local mosques."

    3 - A third school found itself 'strongly challenged by some Christian parents for their treatment of the Arab-Israeli conflict-and the history of the state of Israel that did not accord with the teachings of their denomination'.
    First take a closer look at example 2. Looks like it's the same school as in example 1, but in some other department, the Holocaust was being taught. The complaint was that the Crusades weren't being taught to 11-14 year olds (a bit of a jump from what Kelly wrote). Now look at the third example. This is the one that J-Kel missed entirely. Christian parents challenging the school's treatment of the the Arab-Israeli conflict.

    I'll remind everyone that J-Kel was using the Daily Mail article to prove that British Schools were dropping Holocaust studies out of fear of offending Muslim students.

    How many examples in that article that support Kelly's position? One - that unnamed school in northern England that dropped the Holocaust as a subject for GCSE course work. What is GCSE coursework anyway? According to the Wikipedia, GCSE stands for "General Certificate of Secondary Education." The courses are not compulsory, by the way.

    I dug deeper and found the study itself. You can find it here. If you read the thing, the parts so carefully selected by the wingnuts are all from one section of the study - Page 15, section 6. The study itself is 48 pages long and includes such Holocaust study details as:
    Addressing emotive and controversial history effectively requires an understanding of student misconceptions. Without this awareness of misconceptions about events such as the Holocaust, appropriate learning strategies are rendered impossible. Students often bring misconceptions and stereotypes with them. For example (in relation to the Holocaust), the beliefs that all Germans were Nazis, that the Nazis invented anti-Semitism, that all Jews were helpless victims and that all the victims died in gas chambers. (pg 17)
    Doesn't sound like they're dropping the subject are they? Then there's this from page 32:
    Good practice at Key Stage 4 results when the planning of emotive and controversial history is explicit within the context of the theme or unit. This means exploring multiple perspectives and challenging commonly held misconceptions. For example, in relation to the teaching of the Holocaust, students are taught that Nazi persecution of the Jews was part of a wider policy, which included other groups. They are therefore provided with a context, which sets the Holocaust alongside other genocides and the history of anti-Semitism. In attributing responsibility for the Jewish Holocaust, care is taken that all Germans are not labelled as anti-Semitic. Rescue, resistance and the cultural diversity of Europe in the period are studied, particularly to counter the stereotyping of Jews as helpless victims, awaiting extermination.
    If read carefully, it's obvious that the parts chosen by the wingnuts to show British reluctance to offend Muslim students are actually quiet criticisms of those teachers who aren't teaching history well. The rest of the study is a recommendation on how to approach sensitive topics and teach them.

    I realise that this story is only a slight part of J-Kel's rant this week, but this is how a right wing myth becomes "real." It's distorted and repeated over and over until enough people believe it's true.

    It's bad writing and (oddly enough) it makes for bad history.

    Good going Jack. We always knew you had it in you.

    April 6, 2007

    Bill Donohue Vs. Jesus

    Warning: Many of you may want to skip this post -- especially on Good Friday.

    There are not a few Catholics who believe that Bill Donohue, President of the Catholic League, gives Catholics a bad name. His relentless tirades in the media and the threats he issues against everyone from makers of chocolate Jesuses, to pro choice Catholic politicians (Dems only, natch), to "potty-mouthed" feminist bloggers, to the Jews he claims "control" Hollywood and who "hate Christianity" (and like anal sex) are both legendary and embarrassing to many for whom he claims to speak.

    As someone who, while non believing now, was raised as a Catholic, I have to admit I have fantasized more than once on how a meeting between good ol' Bill Donohue and Jesus might go down.

    I need not fantasize any longer, though, because the boys from South Park have supplied their own version of this meeting in their Easter edition of the show this week.

    In it, Jesus asks Bill, "What is your problem, guy?"

    Let's just say it goes downhill for Bill after that.

    Here's the last third of that South Park episode. (You can probably see the entire show by searching for "Easter" and "South Park" at YouTube, if you're game. It also is a spoof of The Da Vinci Code.)

    Bill O'Reilly's On Air Mental Meltdown

    Watch Bill O'Reilly totally lose his mind:

    Senator Casey on the Iraq War Funding

    KDKA's Jon Delano got a chance to sit down to talk with Senator Bob Casey to talk about the Senator's first 100 days in office. The conversation (as is inevitable, I suppose, these days in DC) turned to Iraq. In the course of the conversation, Casey made these two points:
    If the President vetoes a funding bill and the effect of that becomes the troops don't have funding, that's on his watch. It's not the Congress' fault.

    We want to fund the troops to make sure they have the resources they need but we're not going to allow the President to dictate on his own. The American people have a right to speak and they're speaking, I think, through the voice of Congress.
    Good for him. Say what you will about the Bobster, but on Iraq he's right on the money.

    April 5, 2007

    McNeilly Source Material

    I saw FOP President Malloy on NightTalk last night (guest hosted by Mike Pintek) spin and spin again on the McNeilly settlement. The spin was so bad I thought it might be a good idea to bring everyone back to some primary source material, namely Judge Donetta Ambrose's preliminary injuction. The Judge begins (page 1, line 8-15):

    Why are we here? We are here because the Plaintiff, Catherine McNeilly, on October 9th, 2006, sent e-mails to City Council, the Fire and Medic Bureau chiefs, she blind copied the same to her husband and her brother; and in these e-mails and attachment she questioned the appointment of Dennis Regan as Public Safety Director and Dennis Regan's interference with her attempts to discipline a police officer under her command, who was the brother of Regan's housemate.

    The Plaintiff attached to her e-mails a disciplinary action report she had filed on this police officer which contained personnel information. She was subsequently demoted for having sent the e-mail -- the attached disciplinary action report to the e-mail.

    Malloy last night accused (or at least implied) McNeilly of leaking confidential information to the public. Not so, wrote Judge Ambrose (page 9, line 10-16):
    As to the confidentiality matters, Plaintiff made every effort to keep the e-mail and attached DAR confidential. Indeed, she marked the e-mail confidential and disclosed the information only to those individuals who themselves had a duty to keep it confidential. It was someone to whom Plaintiff disclosed the information, not the Plaintiff herself, who revealed the information to the public.
    Judge Ambrose wrote that McNeilly had two claims in the case, a 1st Amendment claim and a claim under the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Act (showing his own spinning self, Pintek oddly referred to this as a "so-called Whistleblower" case). The Judge found that if McNielly was acting as a private citizen, and if the issue was and issue of public concern, and if she was acting in good faith, then she had 1st Amendment protections. Judge Ambrose (page 10, line 6-17):
    As I said earlier, this is a balancing test. Plaintiff's allegations and evidence of wrongdoing and governmental misconduct and concerns that wrongdoers would be placed in high government positions outweigh the city's concerns the Plaintiff's actions would disrupt the Police Department, which they apparently did not; and that the confidentiality of a disciplinary report was compromised, especially in light of the fact that the e-mail which the Defendants are not complaining about contained the same information as the disciplinary action report, which the Defendants are complaining about. Therefore, the Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of her First Amendment claim.
    And now onto Pintek's "so-called" Whistleblower protection (page 10, line 18-23):
    She also has a claim under the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law which prohibits public employers from retaliating against an employee who makes a good faith report of wrongdoing to appropriate authorities. For the reasons already stated, I find that the Plaintiff made a good faith report of wrongdoing.
    Judge Ambrose finishes up (page 11, line 21 to page 12, line 4):
    Finally, I must consider whether the public interest will be served by granting the injunction. The public interest is always served by disclosure of wrongdoing and undue and/or inappropriate influence by public officials in Police Department matters. The chilling effect of discipline and demotion to a police officer who makes a good faith report of what she believes in good faith to be wrongdoing and inappropriate influence in Government never serves the public interest.
    There was even a little something about that 120-day rule from Ambrose (page 5, line 10-14):
    She consulted the Assistant City Solicitor for assistance in preparing a disciplinary action report. He told her about the 120-day rule and subsequently told her that what she described to him as her approach sounded like a good approach to him.
    She consulted the Assistant City Solicitor on this? That I didn't know. I also didn't know that that ACS told her her approach sounded like a good idea.

    Something else Pintek and Malloy left out of their collective spins.

    Malloy also stated that because the Police Department was so short of funds (for instance, the cars are old, he said) this settlement is a bad bad idea.

    Uh, sorry. That's not McNeilly's problem. If the financial situation of the city is such a concern, then perhaps they should have thought of that before retaliating against McNeilly.

    April 4, 2007

    City Council OKs McNeilly Settlement in 6 - 2 Vote

    Pittsburgh City Council voted 6 to 2 in favor of the $85,000.00 settlement today for Police Commander and whistleblower Catherine McNeilly today.

    Jeff Koch and Tonya Payne cast the "no" votes and, as is often the case, Twanda Carlisle was absent.

    In a complete reversal from Council's behavior in the $200,000.00 settlement in the Sgt. Mark A. Eggleton/Dirty O matter, the vote was preceded by a lengthy conversation of the settlement and court case. While all discussion was stifled only four short weeks ago regarding Eggleton due to "concerns" about "personnel matters" being brought up in public, or "concerns" about playing lawyer at the council table, or charges of playing politics, this time around Council saw no problem in not only discussing the merits of the case, but also inquiring about whether or not McNeilly had put time in at the warrants office while she was being punished and discussing her vacation days and sick days.

    Oh what a difference a difference in the mayors race can make...

    Most Council members expressed that their "yes" votes were made reluctantly.

    Misstatements and misrepresentations were made by some Council members that McNeilly had gone "public" (she didn't -- someone else leaked to the media) and that she had emailed the mayor and Council as a first step ignoring the fact that she initially only contacted the Mayor with her concerns and then later emailed others when Ravenstahl did not reply to her (charge Doug Shields guilty of implying the latter).

    Koch expressed concerns that the settlement "rewarded" someone for breaking the rules -- seemingly oblivious to a judge's determination that McNeilly was a whistleblower, as well as a citizen with First Amendment rights.

    Bill Peduto had to remind members that McNeilly was indeed protected by both whistleblower laws and the US Constitution.

    The Post-Gazette covers the story here.

    UPDATE: I've been meaning to mention that in the last two weeks at least three citizens have gone to Council meetings and spoken out during the public comments section against the stifling of discussion before the vote in the $200,000 settlement in the Eggleton case. Maybe that's why Council decided to have a real discussion of the McNeilly case this time around...

    Hahahahahaha! Yeah, right!

    Sometimes I crack myself up.

    So Much BS In Such A Little Space

    From the AP:
    President Bush denounced "irresponsible" Democrats on Tuesday for going on spring break without approving money for the Iraq war with no strings. He condemned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's trip to Syria, too, accusing her of encouraging a terrorism sponsor.
    Two separate sentences, two separate lines of BS.

    The first sentence, spoken with a straight face by a man who's the most vacationed (on vacation in Crawford, Tx for 405 days so far) President in US History. Yesterday, dubya complained it's been 57 days since he sent the budget request to Congress. That's unacceptable, he said. It puts the troops in greater danger he said. Blah-blah-blah. Turns out that, according to Keith Olbermann, previous Iraq supplemental budgets took LONGER than the one making its way through Congress now. During recent Republican Congresses it took 86 and then 119 days for Congress to finish its work two earlier Iraq supplemental budgets. Nothing from dubya on the danger the Republicans posed to the Nation's Security THEN. (see the video here)

    On the second sentence. Looks like the Administration cooperated with a Republican Congressman on a recent trip to Syria. The info is here. And it links back to this article in the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal. Take a look:

    While U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's upcoming visit to Syria has caused the White House to bristle, a little-publicized rendezvous took place Sunday between Syria's president and Lancaster County's congressman.

    And though Bush administration officials have been criticizing Pelosi, it's not clear what role the White House and the U.S. Department of State played when U.S. Rep. Joe Pitts and two other Republican congressmen met with Syrian President Bassar Assad.

    Pitts is a Chester County Republican who represents Lancaster County.

    Gabe Neville, Pitts' chief of staff, said Monday the conference between Assad and the three Republicans was intended to be "low profile."

    "It was done in cooperation with the administration," he said.

    And that's just the FIRST TWO SENTENCES.

    Cheney Makes Sure Bush Gets It Right

    Just a little creepy.

    April 3, 2007

    Follow-up on Shields Campaign

    Yesterday The Burgh Report reported:

    Although he leaked a poll in February touting his electability, the Doug Shields for Controller campaign seems to have suffered some setbacks.

    They've been calling former Peduto campaigners looking for someone to helm the listing Shields ship. Apparently, they've parted ways with the previous campaign manager and remain hurting for cash, according to those who received the calls.

    A source close to the campaign tells me that it was a campaign consultant who's moved on and that the consultant, a man by the name of Kyle Cox, was hired to "jumpstart" the Shields campaign. My source also told me that "Kyle has moved on to the Presidential campaign commitments he had already lined up."

    I was also told they were happy with the fundraising, and so on.

    UPDATE: Another source (this one close to the Peduto campaign) confirms that Peduto's campaign manager was recently called and was asked if anyone was interested in working for Shields. Interestingly both of my sources praised the quality of Peduto's campaign staff. However my second source tells me that it appears they're going to continue to work for Bill Peduto.

    Developing...

    One more thing about McCain's "stroll" in Baghdad



    Not only did McCain's stroll through a Baghdad market to prove how "safe" it is there require the services of 1 bulletproof vest, 100 American troops, 3 Black Hawk helicopters and 2 Apache gun ships, but some poor mooks had to sweep the area first -- risking their lives for his photo op.

    This is not a man who should ever be our nation's Commander in Chief.

    The Independent on Those Captured British Sailors/Marines

    H/T to Meteor Blades at the dailykos for this.

    Patrick Cockburn writes at The Independent:
    A failed American attempt to abduct two senior Iranian security officers on an official visit to northern Iraq was the starting pistol for a crisis that 10 weeks later led to Iranians seizing 15 British sailors and Marines.
    That's the first paragraph.

    The story has made it all the way to John Nichols's blog at The Nation. I'm not sure what to think as it's also currently the above-the-name link at the Drudgereport.

    But whatever.

    Here's more from Cockburn:

    Early on the morning of 11 January, helicopter-born US forces launched a surprise raid on a long-established Iranian liaison office in the city of Arbil in Iraqi Kurdistan. They captured five relatively junior Iranian officials whom the US accuses of being intelligence agents and still holds.

    In reality the US attack had a far more ambitious objective, The Independent has learned. The aim of the raid, launched without informing the Kurdish authorities, was to seize two men at the very heart of the Iranian security establishment.

    And:

    The two men were in Kurdistan on an official visit during which they met the Iraqi President, Jalal Talabani, and later saw Massoud Barzani, the President of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), at his mountain headquarters overlooking Arbil.

    "They were after Jafari," Fuad Hussein, the chief of staff of Massoud Barzani, told The Independent. He confirmed that the Iranian office had been established in Arbil for a long time and was often visited by Kurds obtaining documents to visit Iran. "The Americans thought he [Jafari] was there," said Mr Hussein.

    So these guys were on "an official visit" meeting with the leaders of the regime the US is currently supporting (and can't not support, out of fear it would collapse without that support). Dubya goes in and snatches 'em anyway.

    Meteor Blades is very careful to point out some caveats here:

    Hussein did not explain how he came by this knowledge. And The Independent apparently did not bother to seek the usual non-denial denial from U.S. authorities. So, some caution, as always, is in order regarding the newspaper’s claim.
    Exactly right.

    April 2, 2007

    Reminder: Tuesday on WPTT 1360

    Matt Pritt will be guest hosting Lynn Cullen show tomorrow and I'll be the in studio guest at 11am

    You can listen live over the internets here.

    A thought . . .

    I saw this video over at the new Shakesville (the new name and home for the Shakespeare's Sister blog) and I thought it perfectly captured in one word my thoughts on the probability of Luke Ravenstahl being Mayor of Pittsburgh for the next two years:



    (Bonus points to anyone who can spot my photo in the Shakesville Shaker Mosaic.)

    City Controller Candidate, Michael Lamb

    Recently, I had a chance to chat with City Council President Doug Shields on the race for City Controller. I didn't plan it, it just sort of happened. We were talking about Bill Peduto's withdrawal from the mayoral primary and the conversation turned to the Controller race. So it seems only fair to talk to some other candidates for that position.

    Seems only fair. And balanced.

    Last week, I had the opportunity to chat with current Prothonotary and candidate for the office of City Controller, Michael Lamb. We met at the Starbucks near the Whole Foods on the eastside of town. The coffee, over-priced and bland. The music shifted in that inexorably Starbucks sort of way from a random Brandenburg to Paul Desmond in 5/4. Lamb in a crisp blue shirt, Lamb's campaign manager Doug and I dressed far more casually.

    Starting with the same question I posed to Shields, I asked how his campaign was going. Understandably (though that's certainly not a criticism) he said it's "going well." and that the grassroots networking stuff is "firing on all cylinders."

    When I asked how he defined "grassroots" that's when the interview took off.

    A little backstory is probably necessary here. The previous mayoral primary race (the one that took place waaaay back in 2005) the top three candidates were, Bob O'Connor, Bill Peduto and Michael Lamb in that order. If my memory serves, O'Connor garnered about half the votes, and Peduto and Lamb (more or less) split the remaning half, with Peduto getting a larger share.

    So coming in third in that race, in one way or another, he's building on the positives and negatives of that race.

    For instance, on one hand he's looking to raise his profile in those sections of the city where he didn't do too well in 2005 (namely those places where O'Connor did very well, like Lincoln Place and Observatory Hill)). On the other, he says he has a greater name recognition because of his participation in the 2005 primary. There's no need for a "learning curve" either for a city-wide race, either. He's got his voter ID database chugging along and just (in a sense) picked up where he left off two years ago.

    Additionally with Peduto pulling out of the race, there's some more attention to be paid to the City Controller race.

    I asked him the next general set of questions: Assuming everything goes his way and he is elected City Controller, what's he going to do once he gets there? First off, he said, there has to be a "cultural change" in the City Controllers office because right now, it's "dysfunctional" (his term). For instance the office is mandated to do a periodical fiscal and performance audits and they haven't been delivered on time in a long time. When asked how the office is able to get away with it, he smiled and answered, "That's a good question."

    Lamb said that he was in a similar position when he took over the Prothonotary's office a number of years ago. He said that when he arrived that office was in "a general malaise" working with what amounted to 19th century technology - books and pens. He updated the office to computers and overcame the internal resistance to change. He said that his experience at the Prothonotary's office would help him at the City Controller's office.

    That's an internal - but what about the rest of the city?

    The biggest issue of all, the city's distressed status. The budget doesn't do anyting, he said, to address the distressed status of the city. Unless things change, he added, we're going to be right back here now in three years. The Controller's office could, he said, put together real numbers showing a clearer picture of the city's finances. It's a necessary step.

    March 31, 2007

    On Why We Shouldn't Torture

    I heard this last night on Real Time with Bill Maher.

    Ok, so it's NOT a transcript (haven't been able to find one) but I think I got the gist of it.

    BM said that we can't take the moral high ground in regards to the Iranian seizure of those British sailors/marines if they're tortured. If we complain, what are the Iranians gonna say, that they're not doing it correctly?

    Thus Spake Bill Maher.

    March 30, 2007

    Success: Rick Swartz will be on the ballot!

    Challengers cry, "Uncle!"

    As we mentioned here, Onorato's Boys challenged Rick's petitions. Here's the latest on this story from the Swartz Campaign:
    About an hour before the court date, Rick Swartz's redoubtable lawyer, Chuck Pascal, got the news: he, and we, had disproved, countered, or otherwise de-fanged enough of their challenges. They threw in the towel.

    Maybe it was the 92 year-old who wrote, "I have been living at this address since 1927."

    Maybe it was the affidavit from Ben Woods (who is, indeed, a Democrat...).

    Maybe it was the people we had ready to come in and testify.

    Maybe they were just wasting our precious time from day 1.

    We'll never know.

    But, one way or another, Rick is on the ballot, and the campaign is moving forward.

    Rick could definitely use a little bit of people's money (hint, hint...and yes, we're looking into ways to take web donations and stay within campaign finance rules...but don't let that stop you from mailing a small check, using the "issues coding" process).

    And, Rick's website is up now (hot off the presses from yours truly):

    www.citizensforswartz.com

    Where in the world is Luke Ravenstahl?

    Agent Ska is all over this story!

    Pittsburgh's Boy Mayor told the Mount Washington Democratic Committee that he could not attend a previous meeting because he claimed to have been suddenly called to New York City on that day (Monday, January 22, 2007) to discuss Penguins business.

    Being the Video Diva that she is, Agent Ska captured Lukey's excuse and put it on YouTube:



    Knowing our Boy Mayor's past troubles with both trips to NYC and telling HUGE WHOPPING LIES, Ska decided to poke around a bit to see if the Mayor's excuse held up.

    You can see the results of her investigations here.

    Hint: While not conclusive, it sure ain't pretty!

    Swartz fights to have his voice heard

    From the Rick Swarz Campaign:

    Candidate Rick Swartz Challenged for Place on Democratic Ballot

    On Friday, March 30, in the courtroom of Judge Joseph M. James, beginning at 1:30 PM, Allegheny County Chief Executive candidate Richard P. Swartz (long-time director of the Bloomfield-Garfield Corporation) will have his day in court. Facing a team of lawyers from one of the most highly regarded and expensive law firms in the state, candidate Swartz intends to persevere with an all-volunteer staff and the help of his lawyer, Leechburg Mayor and current Armstrong County Judicial Candidate, Charles A. Pascal, Jr.

    Last week, an unprecedented string of nominating petition challenges sidelined many would-be candidates, and sapped the time and resources of other local candidates such as Brenda Frazier and Patrick Dowd, who emerged victorious. Other prominent candidates have dropped out of contention at the city and county level.

    Current chief executive Dan Onorato is praising the resulting absence of challengers: "Maybe the city's in a position to look for some security and let things settle down a bit...We don't have elections to distract us."

    Is democracy a distraction? Richard King, defender of the democratic process, says, "Democracy is about open debate...Dan needs a challenger to pull him out of being too secure." Voting rights advocate Audrey Glickman, adds, "Perhaps [democracy] makes Mr. Onorato feel insecure, distracted, and subject to scrutiny because of his poor choice of a soon-to-be-obsolete voting system." Adds past Democratic ward chair Jonathan Robison, "We need to debate the proposed transit cuts and hold a referendum. This is a deeply inappropriate time to close down the primary process."

    Candidate Swartz is determined to remain on the ballot, and his campaign will help Chief Executive Dan Onorato hear the messages he's not currently getting from his inner circle. To that end, Swartz asks supporters to code their contributions: donations ending in $.95 for people who are upset about the transit situation; donations ending in $.96 for people who are upset about the voting machine fiasco; $.97 for road and development decisions; $.98 if you feel the assessment issue has not been fixed; and $0.99 for people who generally support the democratic process and want the county executive to listen better on ALL issues.

    Contacts:
    Acting Campaign Manager Joy Sabl
    CitizensForSwartz@gmail.com
    Campaign contributions to Citizens for Swartz:
    Treasurer Heisler
    208 S. Pacific Ave, Pittsburgh PA 15224-1720
    Website (under construction): http://www.citizensforswartz.com

    Richard P. Swartz for County Executive: "A real Democrat listens."


    Ironically, The Post-Gazette runs a story the very day that Danny O's Camp is in court to try to keep Swarz off the ballot telling how Danny feels about court cases that folks bring against him/his:
    Allegheny County Chief Executive Dan Onorato complained about the courts meddling in county business yesterday after two recent rulings went against his office.

    He called a news conference, he said, because he wanted to "express a little frustration in trying to govern and constantly having the judiciary block us as we try to deal with a home rule government."

    Karma's a bitch!

    Monumental Media Events of Our Time

    MAYORAL DEBATE
    Saturday, March 31, 2007, 10:00 PM
    WBGN TV



    You want a a mayoral debate?

    The "It's Alive" crew accommodates -- Professor Emcee Square will debate "Mayor Ravenstahl" Saturday night at 10:00 PM on WBGN TV. (A reminder that it may have been The Carbolic Smoke Ball's online poll pitting Lukey against the Prof against Peduto which persuaded the latter to drop out of the race.)

    If you've never seen "It's Alive" before think "Chiller Theater" for a new millennium.


    MACYAPPER RETURNS TO THE AIRWAVES
    Monday, April 2, 2007, 1:00 - 4:00 PM
    WTZN-FM 93.7



    John McIntire (MacYapper) returns to the airwaves on the new WTZN-FM 93.7 "THE ZONE, PITTSBURGH'S MAN STATION" (I'm guessing they won't mind you listening if you're a she).

    Looks like you can live stream the station here.

    (Is it just me or do The Professor and The MacYapper look enough alike to be brothers?)

    The More Things Change....

    From Editor and Publisher:

    As widely noted in the press, TV and on the Web in the past 24 hours, Karl Rove stole the show at this year's gathering of the Radio and Television Correspondents Association in Washington D.C. with his attempt at rapping, hipping and hopping. President Bush seemed content to avoid controversy, which is just as well, considering what happened at the same dinner gala in March, 2004 -- a low point during his term in office and for the media.

    Since Bush's "joke" about not finding WMD, an additional 2700 Americans have died in Iraq.

    I'm glad they're still finding things funny at the White House.

    While you're pondering the complete lack of humanity at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, take a look at this. I found it at youtube.




    Have a good morning, Pittsburgh

    March 29, 2007

    Bush Vs. Saint Vincent

    As you probably have heard, our preznit will be speaking at the Saint Vincent College Commencement Ceremonies on May 11, 2007.

    The following link is to an Open Letter to President Bush protesting his visit because, as they put it, not only are his values at odds with Catholic values, his values are at odds with universal values of decency.

    If you know anyone who is specifically a donor, teacher, staff, faculty, student or alumni, please forward it to them and ask them to sign it.

    This is only meant for those who have an actual association with Saint Vincent College so please do not sign it unless you qualify.

    LINK: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/svc/index.html

    One Political Junkie in the Air!

    Set your calendars, 2PJ fans!

    I'll be on Lynn Cullen's show next Tuesday at 11am (1360 WPTT).

    Lynn's taking the day off and so her producer, Matt Pritt, will be behind the microphone.

    I have no idea what's going on between 9 and 11, but I'll be on at 11.

    Potter's Interview With Peduto

    It's an odd thing about the City Paper. It hits the streets on Wednesdays, but it hits the web a day later - on Thursdays. I've been told that it has something to do with the complex nature of alternative media marketing, but I really think it has more to do with some little known aspect of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity.

    I did a little research into this and while I won't bore you with all the mathematical details, I will say that it turns out that under some specific circumstances a unique time-dilation occurs and what we think are two separate events separated by 24 hours are really the same event in 4D spacetime. Kind of like how everything happens in Pittbsurgh 10 years later than in the rest of civilization.

    In any event, Potter's got his interview with Peduto posted.

    So now there are three by my count (are there more? let me know). There's mine, there's the OPJ's transcription of Fred Honsberger's, and now Potters.

    I was struck, when reading Potter's interview, at how much of Peduto's rhetorical devices overlapped in my interview. I recognized a few similar figures of speech - and it looks like Peduto's ad-lib lines were well rehearsed.

    There were "three critical issues; the budget, economic development, and neighborhood revitalization." There was the part about being "Luke's best friend" (a metaphor, no doubt) and about how if he continued his campaign, it would "guarantee" a 6 year term for Ravenstal, or "destroy the reform movement" in the city. And so on.

    The big example, though, was "the perfect storm".

    A source in the P-G tells me that they got roughly the same "spiel" (my source's word - it's yiddish, doncha know, though my source isn't) when Peduto talked to the P-G's editorial board.

    My source, I gotta say, is a real mensch. I, on the other hand, sit on my tuches and kibitz on this blog. Mishuggah, I guess.

    Back to Peduto - I'm not sure whether I'm (further) disappointed about all this. It might just be that's the way politicans do their jobs. They plan out a set of rhetorical schemes, and stick to them no matter who's asking the questions. That's probably it and I'm just being a schmuck. (Or is that a putz? How would I know? I can be such a schlemiel at times.)

    Indeed all this really shows is that Bill Peduto was certainly on message when he talked to the news and blog outlets.

    Oy, so much yiddish. I'm schvitzing.

    March 28, 2007

    There's a new blog in town!

    Much like the Lie Like Luke blog, this one also has a specific focus.

    Its mission?

    To get voters to write in "Bill Peduto" for Mayor in the May primary:

    http://writeinbillpeduto.com

    Can Bill Peduto win with a write-in vote in May?

    Of course not!

    But, it would be funny, say, if he got two or three thousand votes as that's all Luke Ravenstahl got to get where he is now.

    And don't forget, the new machines make it easy to write in a candidate.

    The Heat Is On

    AG Gonzales is beginning to feel the heat.

    Check this out. He's at a press conference to discuss a policy to protect children from internet predators - a press conference sheduled to last 15 minutes.

    He described the policy initiative for about one minute and then took some questions. After three questions on the US Attorney firings, he walked off.

    There's a video attached to the news piece.

    On My Name

    I won't spend more than 5 sentences on this.

    The name is pronounced "Day-voh" not "Davey-voh."

    Twice in the past week I was approached by two different people (and you know who you are!) who each asked me, "Hey, are you Davey-voh?"

    It's "Dayvoe." It's pronounced just like it's spelled - y'know, like "Wojciehowicz."

    Go buy yourself a cookie if you got that last TVLand reference.

    Andrew Sullivan on the US Attorney Scandal

    Trying to sail out again into National News...

    Here's what Andrew Sullivan has to say about the ever-expanding US Attorney scandal:
    The central question is whether the Bush administration has used the U.S. Attorneys as a systematic weapon in targeting the opposition party, rather than rooting out corruption and malfeasance wherever it appears. The natural inference from the evidence so far - and the conflicting stories from the administration - is that the eight fired attorneys were not being partisan enough.
    He links to that statistical showing the evidence of unbalanced prosecutions, but adds that the inbalance occurs at the local level, below the radar of the national press. Calls it "classic Rove."

    March 27, 2007

    Brief Announcement

    Along with Agent Ska, I'll be speaking tonight at the Sierra Club in Oakland on blogging. It's called "Techno Tuesday" or something like that. Agent Ska described it this way:
    The Sierra Club is having a "Techno Tuesday" this upcoming Tuesday, March 27th from 6-8:30. We (Dayvoe and I) will be talkin politics, technology, blogging, vlogging, and heck, maybe even the environment.
    Should be an interesting time.

    9/11 Remains Used to Fill Potholes

    9/11 Remains Used to Fill Potholes.

    Yeah, you heard that right.

    Shakes has the full story here if you can stomach it.

    Just a reminder that this happened under presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani's watch.

    Sick.

    Another Illuminating Interview

    Last Thursday, Bill Peduto appeared on Fred Honsberger's KDKA Radio show. I found the Councilman's remarks on why he left the race to be very illuminating and I promised in the comments section of this post over at The People's Republic of Pittsburgh to post a rough transcript of the most relevant parts here at 2pj. Many of the same points were made by Peduto in David's interview with him which can be found here.

    You can still listen to the KDKA interview here.
    "Peduto Refuses to Play Dirty Politics" KDKA Radio, 2/22/07

    FH: I remember having you on the show and asking you if McIntire was doing you any favors and you said, 'No.'

    BP: People were saying that I was behind the NY thing.

    Everything that I did just by being in this race raised my negatives. Just by being in this race, I raised my negatives.

    If I were to go out and hold a press conference and say I found a plan to hire 100 more cops to be out in the neighborhoods to make them safer, people wouldn't like the plan just because it was me.

    And, I've never had negatives. My negatives testing for internal polling were never higher than 12 -- they are triple that now and it's not because of anything that I've done, it's because I'm running against Luke.

    His popularity is through the roof and it''s all based on image.

    There's no issues that you can go back to and point to and say, "OK, so you like him over Peduto because of them other than 'give him a chance.'"

    FH: Not to rub salt in the wound, but the last line of the Post-Gazette editorial says, "When the going gets tough, the tough get going" and now that you're out questions are being raised over NY. Now that he has no opponent, he can say I'm not going to discuss that anymore.

    BP: Yeah, but I'm not a pawn and that's what I think that the Post-Gazette is trying to say. Saying that Peduto has to go out there and be the sacrificial lamb for us. And you know what? The public wants Luke which they do and -- they got him -- and for me to go out there and destroy my own political career in order to make this a competitive fight by trying to destroy Luke; how is that beneficial to trying to reform Pittsburgh? I don't get that.

    And, the Post-Gazette's written two articles that are substance on the issues and close to 50 to 100 other things that the Ravenstahl PR machine has put out. They've been able to...they had their opportunity to bring up the issues.

    I heard there's a second editorial that said, "No more free pass." Well, guys, guess what? Too late. You got the guy that you helped to create and to blame it on me at this point is not only unfair, it's just plain wrong.

    FH: A run as an independent -- too soon? Maybe wait 2009 to have something to run against...and it doesn't have to be about image hopefully.

    BP: Exactly and maybe the Post-Gazette will ask some second questions. You've got a free college program but how are you gonna pay for it? To give 20 neighborhoods no taxes for property is that going to make the homeowners in this city whole or how are we going to be on hook pay for it?

    You can't just put out press releases and expect them to be policy papers and unfortunately that's what the media has done. They've given Luke a free pass and no wonder. And, I'm not blaming the public. The public believes that good or bad or whatever in the mainstream media and that's what...where this campaign is now.

    FH: This "gotcha journalism" which is pervasive nationally as well as locally. And, they really love doing it. Look we got it, look what we've done now. It really lacks substance and it's really shock value but it backfired this time, didn't it?

    BP: And you know what? Shame on the Post-Gazette for choosing the charged words that they did with me because when this city's back was against the wall and the Post-Gazette was every single time, Luke took the other way, begging City Council to do the right thing. Every time, every single time, I did. And, almost every single time Luke took the other way. And, they know that, and the editorial board knows that, and maybe they're hurt and maybe they thought there's really an opportunity to get the issues presented that are important.

    But I'll tell you what Fred, there's no traction at all with those issues. Those are the issues that I care about. The issues to reform this city and a May 15th primary not only would have destroyed me, but may have destroyed the reform movement in this city and I wasn't going to take that chance to take both of us down with that.

    FH: Is Luke Ravenstahl the Sanjaya of the mayoral primary race?

    BP: Uh...

    FH: If you know Sanjaya from "American Idol" -- looks good but...

    BP: I've never watched the show.

    [snip]

    FH: Is this the fight against the machine? Is the machine really running the whole thing here?

    BP: Yes, but it's not the David L. Lawrence machine. It's not the machine of the 1950s, or the Democratic Committee. The folks on the Committee are handed the crumbs. It's the folks that do the bond issue work without any competitive bidding or the contracts that go out for professional services -- the highway contracts and everything else. And, everyone knows it and they finance the campaigns and then they hold this region back. And, it's the developer that look for zoning variances over the counter and everything else.

    This city needs to be completely clean. It needs to be started over and that's not what the public wants right now. The public wants is to "give this guy a chance."

    FH: I hear what you're saying. You know, I admire you and I admire any politician that says going negative is not the way to win races.

    BP: You know going negative can be not only a way to win a race, but to point out important differences. And, you'll see that in congressional races about Medicare and social security and...but, when it's about a person and issues like handcuffs, and airline flights, and whatever, it destroys the person who's putting it out there too.

    FH: Councilman, I hope to hear form you. I know you're not going away.

    BP: I'm not going away. November's still on the table. Obviously next year's still on the table...or 2009. And, building out a reform movement and bringing others on board is still ongoing. My staff is still on I'm in my campaign headquarters right now.

    FH: Councilman, thank you. Councilman Bill Peduto.

    Stolen Screen Capture


    Saw this at Crooks and Liars. Nice to see Fox is still fair and balanced.

    March 26, 2007

    Peduto on Peduto

    Last Wednesday at about 11 in the morning, Bill Peduto got a phone call from KDKA's political analyst Jon Delano. Delano, Peduto told me this evening, was calling to ask about some rumors he'd been hearing that morning - rumors that Peduto was withdrawing from the Mayoral race.

    That day, Peduto was going to get a lot of phone calls like that. E-mails, too. He's still returning those calls to explain what he did last Wednesday and why he did it.

    I imagine it's got to be tiring having the same 15 minute conversation over and over again. Like a bad Twilight Zone episode except Rod Serling's no where to be found and there are no Chevy commercials to break up the monotony.

    I talked with Councilman Peduto this evening at his campaign headquarters in Shadyside. I'd seen the place a while ago, when it was colder outside and there were more people inside, but he says the place is still up and running and will be until at least May.

    During the interview Peduto himself seemed a bit tired and as we talked he spent most of the time with his arms folded in front of him, his cell phone and PDA neatly squared in front of him. He seemed resigned to tell the whole story one more time.

    He told me that by last Monday and Tuesday he realized he faced an unwinnable situation. If he ran the campaign he wanted to run, focussing on the city's budget, neighborhoods, and economic development, he was going to lose - and lose big. Mayor Ravenstahls poll numbers were just so overpowering that nothing (not the Heinz Field handcuffs nor the almost secret jet flights to NYC) could have budged them. The only way, Peduto said, to make the playing field a bit more level would have been to go negative. But even that wasn't much of an option. His negatives were already climbing and in some areas of the city, his negatives were even higher than his positives. And any mention of Ravehstahl's stumbles only raised Peduto's negatives - unbelievable, but true.

    And that's not good place for a politician running for office to be in.

    He believes that had he gone negative, he would have lost sizeable chunks of his own support - upwards of a 1/3 of his more idealistic Peduto supporters who want more than anything else a clean campaign.

    So a loss it was to be and it would have been so overwhelming that it threatened to derail whatever movement for reform there is in Pittsburgh. And that, to Bill Peduto, was unacceptable.

    Campaign Financing

    I had to check all the bases. The campaign, Peduto said, was not in any dire financial need. He said they'd raised $200k and had commitments to $400k more. There's enough cash to run the office until May. So money wasn't a part of the story.

    Ravenstahl's Poll Numbers

    When asked why Raventahl's numbers were so high Peduto use the metaphor of a "perfect storm" made up of three parts.

    The first was Ravehstah's "prolonged honeymoon period" with the media. Each misstep, he said, each minor incident where Peduto "called him on it" the media was silent or it parrotted the Mayor's oft-used charge that Peduto was "just being political." Mix that in with a still present sympathy for the Late Bob O'Connor (one that morphed into an emotional connection forthe voters between the late mayor and the current one) and add that all together with what Peduto called a "coalescing of the political machine" around the Ravenstahl administration. This machine is different from past machines - it's not the Allegheny County Democratic Committee, for instance - it's those businesses that thrive under the current state of city contracts and those people who depend on them. The defenders of the status quo.

    Mix all those things together and you have what supports the Ravenstahl image. An image, Peduto reminded me, that came from a blank slate. No one knew who Ravenstahl was a few short months ago.

    The idee fixe

    Throughout the interview Peduto kept returning to one fixed idea. He said that while he understands how his supporters are hurt, in order to continue the fight for reform in this city, there had to be a tactical retreat. If not, then everything they'd fought for over the last 10 years could be erased Possibly losing it all just in order to finish the fight seems less than wise. One can lose with honor, but this time that wasn't an option.

    As for Peduto's future, it's open. The only thing that was decided was the May 15th primary.

    Shhh...Go back to sleep, my lovelies, nothing to see here.

    While reading this excellent post over at The Burgh Report about Luke Ravenstahl's real record with Act 47, I came across a link to this Post-Gazette article by Rich Lord. In it, I read the most astonishing quotes regarding the Mayors non-race. First, there was this:
    "I just thought we needed to take a collective breath and enjoy some stability," said state Sen. Jim Ferlo, an early supporter of Mr. Ravenstahl.
    Spoken like a true Old Boy Back Room Pol who helps hold the strings that bind our puppet-like Mayor.

    But the quote that truly blew my mind was this one by another puppet master, "The Boss":
    "Maybe the city's in a position to look for some security and let things settle down a bit," said Mr. Onorato. "We don't have elections to distract us."
    God forbid the public should be distracted by a little thing like an election!

    I'm trying hard to think of a context in which an elected public official in a DEMOCRACY could make a statement like that and it be acceptable.

    [thinking]

    Nope.

    Can't think of a one.

    What's even more distressing is the thought that said public official challenged the petitions of his only opponent in his own race this May (Rick Swartz). The very fact that Onorato's Boys thought that they should challenge Swartz, who is a first time politician with almost no name recognition, shows how desperately and cravenly the Old Guard claws to stay in power.

    Perhaps when Onorato was speaking of what a "distraction" elections are, he was thinking of his own.

    (Hush now. Go back to sleep. Don't let any nasty little elections disturb your sweet dreams.)

    The Big Lie Surfaces

    I normally don't comment on Letters to the Editor, but when one comes from the Vice Chairman of the Republican Committee of Allegheny County, attention, as they say, must be paid.

    In a somewhat overheated defense of USAttorney Mary Beth Buchanan, Dave Majernik (the above named Vice Chairman) offered up this:
    The PG conveniently omitted that when Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he, in an unprecedented move, fired all 93 U.S. attorneys at once to appoint his own. And, I bet, at that time, the PG was not concerned about any political motives in the Clinton Justice Department.
    Ah, the all-purpose defense of from the Right:
    But When Clinton did it, the press was silent.
    Turns out, of course, that Mr Majernik is straight up, 180 degrees wrong. From the McClatchy from 3/13/07) two weeks ago:
    Mass firings of U.S. attorneys are fairly common when a new president takes office, but not in a second-term administration.
    And from the Wall Street Journal a day later (3/14/07), it looks like what's "unprecendented" is the firing of so many US Attorneys midterm:
    Although Bush and President Bill Clinton each dismissed nearly all U.S. attorneys upon taking office, legal experts and former prosecutors say the firing of a large number of prosecutors in the middle of a term appears to be unprecedented and threatens the independence of prosecutors.
    And would you look at the opening of that paragraph?
    "Although Bush and President Clinton each dismissed nearly all U.S. Attorneys..."
    Mr Majernik seems to have made a convenient ommision of his own. I checked out the blurb on him at the RCAC. Seems to be out of date:
    For the past six years, Dave has served as the Chair of the Plum Borough Republican Committee which has consistently delivered winning votes for Republican candidates despite almost a two to one Democrat (sic) registration advantage.
    Isn't Plum Borough a part of the Pennsylvania 4th Congressional District? Wasn't that Melissa Hart's district? Didn't the Republicans lose that district in Novemner 2007?

    Good work, Dave.

    Another Lie from AG Gonzales

    Via Muckraker, I found this from the McClatchy Papers:

    Internal Bush administration e-mails suggest that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales may have played a bigger role than he has acknowledged in the plan to fire several U.S. attorneys.

    The e-mails, delivered to Congress Friday night, show that Gonzales attended an hourlong meeting on the firings on Nov. 27, 2006 - 10 days before seven U.S. attorneys were told to resign. The attorney general's participation in the session calls into question his assertion that he was essentially in the dark about the firings.

    While it's a nice way of putting it, "calls into question" really is just a euphemism for "is more evidence to the AG's lack of credibility."

    But I want everyone to notice when the e-mails were delivered: Friday night. The administration has to know how bad things look - they delivered the bad news on a Friday night, when no one is watching.

    Here's the funny. The DoJ's spin on how why what's so obvious isn't what it seems:

    A Justice Department spokesman said the latest disclosures don't contradict Gonzales' statements that he knew little about the firings.

    "This meeting concerned the roll-out of the U.S. attorney plan. The information available to us does not indicate that there was discussion at this meeting about which U.S. attorneys should or should not be on the list," spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.

    And if it DID include the specific attorneys, I'm sure they would have said that since the discussion didn't include the date (or some other detail significant or otherwise) AG Gonzales didn't contradict his sworn testimony to Congress.

    Muckraker has more:
    McClatchy hits all the high points, the main one being, of course, that Alberto Gonzales sat in on a meeting about the firings on November 27 to review the firing plan. The firings occurred ten days later. During his "I take full responsibilty but I didn't know anything about it" press conference earlier this month, Gonzales said "I was not involved in seeing any memos, was not involved in any discussions about what was going on."
    Cartainly calls into question his credibility.

    It also highlights the lie of the DoJ's spin. Gonzales said he was not involved in any discussion, yet the DoJ says that since the meeting wasn't about specific US Attorneys, his being involved in a discussion isn't in fact the contradiction it appears to be.

    As Groucho once said, "Who you going to believe, me or your own lying eyes?"

    March 25, 2007

    On The Shields Campaign

    Recently, I got a chance to chat with Pittsburgh City Council President, Doug Shields. The first part of our dicussion can be found here.

    I asked him how his own campaign (for City Controller)was going. He said it's "going very well." He's happy with how the endorsements are going, he's happy with his fundraising (a recent fundraiser raised $30K). While he was late to campaign, he's happy with his progress.

    He said he was happy with his polling numbers and said they'd found out that out of the 400 households polled, amongst those who voted, he came in first with 26% (followed by his opponents polling at 20% and 15% respectively). The P-G, though, reported slightly different numbers here (Shields at 19% followed by his two opponents polling at 18% and 16% respectively). My guess is that Shields' phrase "amongst those who voted" skewed the numbers in his favor. But that's just a guess, I haven't been able to see the poll's internal numbers.

    The thing that I had to ask, though, was about his current seat. See, Doug's the current City Council Member for District 5. If he wins the City Controller race, he'd have to resign the seat on City Council.

    So far, it's a complicated picture. His opponent for the council seat, Theresa Colaizzi, dropped out of the race this past Friday - so he's running unopposed there. Shields has a number of opponents for the City Controller position. While he won the party's endorsement for his council seat, he came in third in the run for the endorsement for City Controller. See? Complicated.

    I asked him what would be gained and what would be lost with the change, if he were to succeed? He explained that he'd be able to bring a lot more to the table as City Controller.

    The Controller, he explained, is a check and balance on the local level. At the national level the government's checks and balances are found in the three branches of government; The Executive, Legislative and Judicial. Locally, Shields says the tripartite system of checks and balances are found in these three; Mayor's Office, City Council and the Controller.

    The Controller's office is, he says, a "fair witness" for the people - someone to keep up with the numbers. It's a position that can challenge the mayor's office in ways the city council can't.

    His first priority (and I need a ruling from the judges on my use of the phrase "first priority." Isn't that a redundancy? Is there really comething called a second priority? If something is a priority, doesn't it, by definition, come first? I really need to know.) is a reorganization of the Controller's office. The software is easily a decade old (He said they had to run Window's 96 to operate it).

    After Act 47 (and Shields pointed to Act 47 as the point where Pittsburgh "went down the toilet.") the city needs to elect someone to keep track of the numbers.

    He thinks he's just the guy for the job.

    I'll be contacting his opponents to for their views on the race this week.