Some people who filed an affidavit for Allegheny County in the Pennsylvania presidential recount received a big, fat surprise today: Notification that there will be a hearing, tomorrow, in the Court of Common Pleas.
A two inch stack of papers containing a copy of everyone who filed an affidavit was sent by the Law Offices of Meyer Unkovic & Scott and attorney Ronald L. Hicks, Jr.(a self-described "Pennsylvania business and oil and gas rights trial lawyer)". These are the same folks who represented the Republicans who attempted to squash the recount in the first place.
The hearing will be held, tomorrow, December 2, 2016 at 11:00 am at the City-County Building, 414 Grant Street, Room 707. It will be presided over by the Honorable Joseph M James (notable for having struck down Pittsburgh sick leave and security guard training ordinances).
While many who filed have received the packet, so far, not all have.
I assume the mainstream media will be there...
It's worth noting at this time that this past summer, Steve Bannon (chief strategist and senior counselor to President-elect Trump and former chief curator of the "alt-right") somehow “knew” precisely which swing states Donald Trump would flip (Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan).
More background here.
5 comments:
"It's worth noting at this time"...
Remember when questioning the integrity of the US election was the highest heresy to progressives?
Bannon knew which states Trump would go into and buy off people. Easy for a person that wealthy to do. They had a plan
Not really. AL GORE stood back far too soon in 2000. Had he done more to challenge that race, perhaps, we wouldn't be having this problem. After all, we know, when crooks get away with a little crime, they keep moving up to the big time. In 2016, the fact that one of TRUMP's ops in WI or was that MI was convicted, already, of 10 counts of felony election fraud. And We know that RUSSIA hacked USA security systens. It is time WE THE PPL get some answers. WHERE THERE IS SMOKE, there is FIRE.
I thank Maria for still having the courage of her convictions and allowing comments to her posts. But, on topic: J. James had an excellent reputation and strikes down laws that are unconstitutional and unenforceable. I am sure he will follow the law here.
I read J. James has allowed the recount to go forward, disputed being filed in the wrong venue. Interestingly, your co-contributor here has not called out Stein for lying even though she has no evidence of fraud yet continued to expound such things (see his post of 11/27).
Post a Comment