July 11, 2009

More on Bush's Criminal Behavior

From the AP via Talkingpoints memo:
The Bush administration authorized secret surveillance activities that still have not been made public, according to a new government report that questions the legal basis for the unprecedented anti-terrorism program.
And:

The report describes the program as unprecedented and raises questions about the legal grounding used for its creation. It also says the intelligence agencies' continued retention and use of the information collected under the program should be carefully monitored.

Many senior intelligence officials believe the program filled a gap in intelligence. Others, including FBI, CIA and National Counterterrorism Center analysts, said intelligence gathered by traditional means was often more specific and timely, according to the report. [emphasis added]

Here's the report, if you wanted to follow along.

The report brings up this enticing little tidbit:
The IG report said an unnamed White House official inserted a paragraph into the first threat assessment prepared by the CIA after the Sept. 11 attacks, which was used to justify the extraordinary intelligence measures.

The paragraph said that the "individuals and organizations involved in global terrorism possessed the capability and intention to undertake further terrorist attacks within the United States," according to the report. It also said that the president should authorize the NSA to conduct the surveillance activities.

Here's the text from the report (page 7-8):
The CIA initially prepared the threat assessment memoranda that were used to support the Presidential Authorization and periodic reauthorizations of the PSP. The memoranda documented intelligence assessments of the terrorist threats to the United States and to U.S. interests abroad from al-Qa'ida and affiliated terrorist organizations. These assessments were prepared approximately every 45 days to correspond with the President's Authorizations of the PSP.

The Director of Central Intelligence's (DCI) Chief of Staff was the initial focal point for preparing the threat assessment memoranda. According to the former DCI Chief of Staff, he directed CIA terrorism analysts to prepare objective appraisals of the current terrorist threat, focusing primarily on threats to the U.S. homeland, and to document those appraisals in a memorandum. Initially, the analysts who prepared the threat assessments were not read into the PSP and did not know how the threat assessments would be used. CIA's terrorism analysts drew upon all sources of intelligence in preparing these threat assessments.

After the terrorism analysts completed their portion of the memoranda, the DCI Chief of Staff added a paragraph at the end of the memoranda stating that the individuals and organizations involved in global terrorism (and discussed in the memoranda) possessed the capability and intention to" undertake further terrorist attacks within the United States. The DCI Chief of Staff recalled that the paragraph was provided to him initially by a senior White House official. The paragraph included the DCI's recommendation to the President that he authorize the NSA to conduct surveillance activities under the PSP.
Let me see if I can hash this out. The CIA threat assessments were used to support the Presidential Authorizations. But to the FIRST threat assessment, the White House added text stating that the terrorists possessed the capability to undertake further terrorist attacks in the US.

I have a question: If that text (or something like it) was already in the assessment, then why was it necessary to add? It follows that if it was added, then it must not have been in the original. And the text came from the White House.

And so the White House doctored-CIA authored threat assessment was then used to justify the White House's authorization to extend the surveillance.

More later...

2 comments:

  1. the biggest thing that they have going for them are the people in this country that refuse(for whatever reasons) to believe that their country would ever DO anything that smacks of a communistic regime.

    thry had better wake up, soon
    and investigate and punish the guilty heavily so that no one will try this sort of thing for at least the next 50 years or so.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think that's it. It's more the fear of another terrorist attack. GWB had nothing to boast about other than "we kept you safe," ignoring that 9/11 happened on his watch. Most people are going to be untouched by FBI/CIA snooping because they're just not going to draw that attention. So when you say, "We're doing it to keep the bad guys from attacking again," it resonates on two levels: 1. You're keeping us safe, and 2. Even if the spying is illegal, it doesn't affect me.

    ReplyDelete