Democracy Has Prevailed.

May 3, 2024

President Biden On The Campus Protests

You can read the transcript here.

He started by pointing out two fundamental principles of this republic:

The first is the right to free speech and for people to peacefully assemble and make their voices heard.  The second is the rule of law.  Both must be upheld. 
 
We are not an authoritarian nation where we silence people or squash dissent.  The American people are heard.  In fact, peaceful protest is in the best tradition of how Americans respond to consequential issues. 
 
But — but neither are we a lawless country.  We are a civil society, and order must prevail. 
 
Throughout our history, we’ve often faced moments like this because we are a big, diverse, free-thinking, and freedom-loving nation. 
 
In moments like this, there are always those who rush in to score political points.  But this isn’t a moment for politics.  It’s a moment for clarity. 
 
So, let me be clear.  Peaceful protest in America — violent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is.  It’s against the law when violence occurs. 
 
Destroying property is not a peaceful protest.  It’s against the law.

Adding, a little bit later:

There should be no place on any campus, no place in America for antisemitism or threats of violence against Jewish students.  There is no place for hate speech or violence of any kind, whether it’s antisemitism, Islamophobia, or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans.
 
It’s simply wrong.  There is no place for racism in America.  It’s all wrong.  It’s un-American. 

True.

May 1, 2024

Trump On Abortion - Via Time Magazine

Two sources at Time.

The full transcript of the interview.

Time's reporting on the interview.

Let me just start with one off-hand remark that the orange vulgarity tossed off in one of his many non-answers on abortion. The reporter was (vainly, as it turns out) trying to pin Trump down on committing to a veto on any national ban on a woman's right to choose when he said:

And you know what? That’s taken tremendous pressure off everybody. But we—it was ill-defined. And to be honest, the Republicans, a lot of Republicans, didn't know how to talk about the issue. That issue never affected me. 

Ok - now we know he's BS-ing.  Why? Because of this:

Donald Trump has been called out on social media for giving a speech at Friday's annual March For Life despite reportedly suggesting he asked his second wife Marla Maples to get an abortion when she became pregnant with Tiffany. 

Trump criticized US abortion laws as among the most permissive in the world in a speech to anti-abortion activists at the rally in Washington, DC, and pledged his administration would always defend the 'right to life.' 

But he was quickly skewered on social media as people reminded him of an interview he gave with Howard Stern in 2004, in which he can be heard telling the talk-show host that he suggested Maples have an abortion, according to tapes leaked to Newsweek from the Howard Stern Show.    

Uh-oh. You mean Donald Trump told a fib?  On record?  To a reporter??

But let's move on. Remember this paraphrase of Maya Angelou:

When people show you who they are, believe them.

Here's how Trump succeeds in not answering the question about a federal ban:

I understand, sir. Your allies in the Republican Study Committee, which makes up about 80% of the GOP caucus, have included the Life of Conception act in their 2025 budget proposal. The measure would grant full legal rights to embryos. Is that your position as well? 

Trump: Say it again. What? 

The Life at Conception Act would grant full legal rights to embryos, included in their 2025 budget proposal. Is that your position?

Trump: I'm leaving everything up to the states. The states are going to be different. Some will say yes. Some will say no. Texas is different than Ohio.

Would you veto that bill? 

Trump: I don't have to do anything about vetoes, because we now have it back in the states.

If taken a face-value, Trump doesn't seem to understand the purpose of an executive branch veto is.

You can read the text here. The act effectively moves the issue back into the Federal Government. Perhaps Trump doesn't understand that as well.

When asked whether states "Do you think states should monitor women's pregnancies so they can know if they've gotten an abortion after the ban" he answers:

I think they might do that. Again, you'll have to speak to the individual states. 

A win for states' rights, I suppose but a loss for individual liberty. 

What a Trump future looks like.

 


April 30, 2024

PA State Sen Mastriano Does It Again

And by "it" I mean he's bragging about accomplishing something that, had the GOP in Congress had their way, would never have been funded.

Take a look.

We start at Doug's "Government Official" FB page where he posted this:

 

If you were you to click on the link, you'd make it here. This is the first sentence of the piece:

Pennsylvania state Sen. Doug Mastriano on Friday announced that nearly $735,000 in funding has been awarded for a pedestrian and bicycle route project in the Franklin County borough of Chambersburg.

And this is the last:

Funding for the project is provided through the Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside, Mastriano said. 

Ok. So what's the Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside? 

Well, let's go to PennDOT and see:

The federal Transpo​rtation Alternatives Set-Aside (TASA) provides funding for projects and activities defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation, trails that serve a transportation purpose, and safe routes to school projects.

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), continues to fund the TA Set-Aside through 2026. 
Ok, so now let's take a look at that Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
 
It was introduced as HR 3684 and sponsored by Oregon Democrat Pete Defazio in June of 2021. It made it out of the house with two GOP votes - otherwise all the Democrats voted for it and all the other Republicans voted against. In the Senate it passed (with an amendment) with only 30 GOP votes.  The House voted on the amended bill with only 13 GOP votes.
 
Had the GOP gotten its way on this, there'd be no bill. Plain and simple. And with no bill, there'd be no funding to the TASA. And with no funding to the TASA, PA State Sen Doug Mastriano would not have been able to make his announcement regarding the bike and pedestrian route project.

Plain and simple.  If he were an honest man, Doug Mastriano would be thanking US House and Senate Democrats (and President Joe Biden) for making this all possible.

April 29, 2024

GOP On A Woman's Reproductive Choice

The text ends this way:

No matter where you stand on abortion, no one wants women to die. So why do republicans act like that's exactly what they want?

Because the cruelty is the point.

April 26, 2024

Some Notes From X (Formerly Known as Twitter) About Nutmegger Dave McCormmick

Well, there's this:

And this:

This is Dave McCormick.

April 25, 2024

Arizona Indictments! (Read The Pennsylvania Parts)

From The Washington Post:

An Arizona grand jury on Wednesday indicted seven attorneys or aides affiliated with Donald Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign as well as 11 Arizona Republicans on felony charges related to their alleged efforts to subvert Joe Biden’s 2020 victory in the state, according to an announcement by the state attorney general.

Those indicted include former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, attorneys Rudy Giuliani, Jenna Ellis, John Eastman and Christina Bobb, top campaign adviser Boris Epshteyn and former campaign aide Mike Roman. They are accused of allegedly aiding an unsuccessful strategy to award the state’s electoral votes to Trump instead of Biden after the 2020 election. Also charged are the Republicans who signed paperwork on Dec. 14, 2020, that falsely purported Trump was the rightful winner, including former state party chair Kelli Ward, state Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, and Tyler Bowyer, a GOP national committeeman and chief operating officer of Turning Point Action, the campaign arm of the pro-Trump conservative group Turning Point USA.

Readers of this blog will recall the Pennsylvania connections to some of the above indicted.

We'll be looking at some of the Pennsylvania mentions in this Arizona Indictment.

Digging through it, I found this:

During a conference call on December 12, 2020, a Pennsylvania attorney expressed concern that the certificate of vote falsely claimed that the Republican electors were the "duly elected and certified electors." He requested adding language to the certificates indicating that the Trump-Pence electors' votes were contingent on being certified the duly elected and qualified electors. (p. 41)

Looking forward to finding out who that "Pennsylvania attorney" was. 

After a brief discussion about that contingency, there's this:

Pennsylvania insisted on the language. Unindicted Coconspirator 4 prepared a draft and sent [REDACTED] and Findlay the following email on December 13, 2020:

Mike, here is my suggested language for dealing with the concern raised in the PA conference call about Electors possibly facing legal exposure (at the hands of a partisan AG} if they seem to certify that they are currently the valid Electors. 

Easily fixed ....

It strike [sic] me that if inserting these few words is a good idea for PA, it might be worth suggesting to Electors in other states

Pennsylvania attorneys eventually added the following introduction to their elector vote certificates: 

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, on the understanding that if, as a result of a final non-appealable Court Order or other proceeding prescribed by law, we are ultimately recognized as being the duly elected and qualified Electors for President and Vice President of the United States of America from the State of Pennsylvania, hereby certify the following .... 

By December 12, 2020, Unindicted Coconspirator 4 had prepared documents for each state except New Mexico. [REDACTED] asked Unindicted Coconspirator 4 to prepare New Mexico. He did, and included his drafted contingency language as follows, "WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, on the understanding that it might later be determined that we are the duty elected and qualified Electors .... "

Look familiar? 

Because that's exactly what happened

The new part is learning that the idea of the text added to the Pennsylvania and Nevada fake certificates came out of a discussion in Pennsylvania.

AZ Law blog says this about UC4:

Unindicted co-conspirator #4 is a Trump campaign atty who didn't get indicted (like Eastman, Ellis, Giuliani and Bobb), but wrote memos. That is likely Kenneth Chesebro, who had been extensively interviewed by AZ AG's office.

Ok. But, still, who was that "Pennsylvania attorney" mentioned?

So now I am wondering if someone (anyone??) in the Pennsylvania political reporting class will ask State Senator Doug Mastriano (reportedly the WH's "point person" on the Pennsylvania part of Trump's "fake elector" scheme) and/or Allegheny County Counsel-at-Large and chair of the Republican Committee of Allegheny County Sam DeMarco III (one of the signers of the Pennsylvania "fake elector" certificate) if they had any comment on these indictments out of Arizona - seeing that discussions in Pennsylvania got a solid mention in them.

Anyone?  Anyone?


April 24, 2024

Wait, What?? (Indicted Trump Wins PA, But Still)

At the outer edges, the story of yesterday's GOP primary looks like this:

Donald J. Trump and President Biden scored overwhelming primary victories in the battleground state of Pennsylvania on Tuesday, facing opponents who had long since dropped out of the race. 

However, take a look at this:

 

Wait, what?

How long has it been since Nikki Haley dropped out of the race?

Nearly 7 weeks ago:

Nikki Haley suspended her presidential campaign on Wednesday after being soundly defeated across the country on Super Tuesday, leaving Donald Trump as the last remaining major candidate for the 2024 Republican nomination.

And yet, in Pennsylvania, she still got 1/6th of the vote??

Not only is he on trial in Manhattan, not only does he still owe nearly a half billion dollars in fines from two other cases he lost, but he's lost (if the above numbers are any indication) a sixth of Pennsylvania's republican voters.

That can't be good for him. 

Poor guy.