Giuliani Disbarred

From The NYTimes:

A panel of judges on the District of Columbia Court of Appeals on Thursday barred Rudolph W. Giuliani from practicing law in Washington because of false statements he made about the 2020 election results while he was former President Donald J. Trump’s personal lawyer.

You can read the order here:

On consideration of the certified order from the state of New York disbarring respondent from the practice of law; this court’s July 25, 2024, order maintaining respondent’s suspension pending final disposition of this proceeding and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed on August 9, 2021; and it appearing that respondent has not filed a response, it is

ORDERED that Rudolph W. Giuliani is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, nunc pro tunc to August 9, 2021.

That July 25, 2024 order can be found here.

You know what I'm gonna do next, right?

Yep:

The Referee found that on November 25, 2020, in violation of rules 4.1, 8.4(c), 8.4(d), and 8.4(h), respondent falsely and dishonestly claimed to Pennsylvania state legislators that in Philadelphia during the 2020 Presidential election, many thousands of votes were cast in the names of dead people. 

Respondent stipulated that “[m]any thousands of votes were not cast in the names of dead people in Philadelphia during the 2020 election.” Further, the Referee found that respondent knew, or should have known, that on November 11, 2020, Philadelphia Commissioner Al Schmidt, a Republican, made a televised statement in which he criticized the allegations of fraud as having no basis in fact and specifically concluded that the investigations regarding dead voters had led nowhere.

The date of the violation: November 25, 2020.

Again, yep.  That was Pennsylvania State Senator Doug Mastriano's hearing on election irregularities:

The hearing on election irregularities in Gettysburg was historic. @PASenateGOP @SenatorArgall pic.twitter.com/DouU5fbkLs

— Senator Doug Mastriano (@SenMastriano) November 26, 2020

Interesting thing, if you go to Sen Mastriano's official page and look for the link to the meeting, you get this:

Oops! That page can’t be found.

And searching for the name "Giuliani" also comes up empty.

Perhaps I am looking in the wrong place, perhaps it's a glitch.

But if neither is the case, did Doug Mastriano scrub the references to the disbarred Giuliani and that November 2020 hearing from his webpage?

Any comment (or corrections) for the blog, Senator?

Women Are Dying

Thanks to Trump's SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade, women are now dying.

(h/t to Lawrence O'Donnell):

From Propublica: 

Candi Miller’s health was so fragile, doctors warned having another baby could kill her.

“They said it was going to be more painful and her body may not be able to withstand it,” her sister, Turiya Tomlin-Randall, told ProPublica.

But when the mother of three realized she had unintentionally gotten pregnant in the fall of 2022, Georgia’s new abortion ban gave her no choice. Although it made exceptions for acute, life-threatening emergencies, it didn’t account for chronic conditions, even those known to present lethal risks later in pregnancy.

And:

Miller ordered abortion pills online, but she did not expel all the fetal tissue and would need a dilation and curettage procedure to clear it from her uterus and stave off sepsis, a grave and painful infection. In many states, this care, known as a D&C, is routine for both abortions and miscarriages. In Georgia, performing it had recently been made a felony, with few exceptions.

Her teenage son watched her suffer for days after she took the pills, bedridden and moaning. In the early hours of Nov. 12, 2022, her husband found her unresponsive in bed, her 3-year-old daughter at her side.

And finally:

Her family later told a coroner she hadn’t visited a doctor “due to the current legislation on pregnancies and abortions.”

She died and it was preventable and it was all because of Georgia's ban on abortions, a law made possible by Trump's SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade.

Not the first time this has happened.

More from Propublica:

In her final hours, Amber Nicole Thurman suffered from a grave infection that her suburban Atlanta hospital was well-equipped to treat.

She’d taken abortion pills and encountered a rare complication; she had not expelled all of the fetal tissue from her body. She showed up at Piedmont Henry Hospital in need of a routine procedure to clear it from her uterus, called a dilation and curettage, or D&C.

But just that summer, her state had made performing the procedure a felony, with few exceptions. Any doctor who violated the new Georgia law could be prosecuted and face up to a decade in prison.

Thurman waited in pain in a hospital bed, worried about what would happen to her 6-year-old son, as doctors monitored her infection spreading, her blood pressure sinking and her organs beginning to fail.

It took 20 hours for doctors to finally operate. By then, it was too late.

She died and it was preventable and it was all because of Georgia's ban on abortions, a law made possible by Trump's SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade.

Then there's this from Oklahoma:

The molar pregnancy Jaci Statton had would never become a baby. It was cancerous, though.

At the last hospital in Oklahoma she went to during her ordeal last month, Statton says staff told her and her husband that she could not get a surgical abortion until she became much sicker.

"They were very sincere; they weren't trying to be mean," Statton, 25, says. "They said, 'The best we can tell you to do is sit in the parking lot, and if anything else happens, we will be ready to help you. But we cannot touch you unless you are crashing in front of us or your blood pressure goes so high that you are fixing to have a heart attack.'"

Oklahoma has three overlapping abortion bans, with different and sometimes contradictory definitions and exceptions. A study published Tuesday along with a commentary in the Lancet medical journal shows hospitals all over Oklahoma are struggling to interpret the laws and create policies that comply with the state's abortion bans. The resulting confusion is having dangerous consequences for women like Statton.

She didn't die. She was just made to suffer. 

It was preventable. It was cruel. And in Trump's America, the cruelty is the point.

 

 

 

 

Meanwhile, Outside

From NOAA:

The August global surface temperature was 1.27°C (2.29°F) above the 20th-century average of 15.6°C (60.1°F), making it the warmest August on record. This was 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the previous August record set last year, and the 15th consecutive month of record-high global temperatures. August 2024 marked the 46th consecutive August (since 1979) with temperatures at least nominally above the 20th-century average.

Science. 

And then there's this:

The June 2024–August 2024 global surface temperature was the warmest June–August period in the 175-year record, 1.24°C (2.23°F) above the 20th-century average of 15.6°C (60.1°F). The past eleven June–August seasons have been the warmest such periods on record.

More science. 

Of course Project 2025 calls for the end of NOAA:

Break Up NOAA. The single biggest Department of Commerce agency outside of decennial census years is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which houses the National Weather Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, and other components. NOAA garners $6.5 billion of the department’s $12 billion annual operational budget and accounts for more than half of the department’s personnel in non-decadal Census years (2021 figures). (pg 674) [Bolding in original.]

But not because the science is wrong but for this reason:

Together, these form a colossal operation that has become one of the main
drivers of the climate change alarm industry and, as such, is harmful to future
U.S. prosperity.

Of course.

It's getting warmer out there.  It'll still get warmer if NOAA is broken up and no one knows but that's ok because business is boomier!

 

That Morning

The Debate Summed Up

VP Kamala Harris could have started every rebuttal with:

Nothing Donald Trump just said is actually true.

In short:

• Immigrants are not stealing their neighbor's pets for food.
• No one "aborting" children after they're born.

If you support the guy who said so during the debate, you're supporting a guy with little (if any) contact with reality.

More On Trump's Politicization of the DOJ

So when our right wing friends claim that Biden/Harris/Walz has politicized/is going to politicize the DOJ, just mention this:

A new report from Rolling Stone claims that former President Donald Trump wanted to use the United States Department of Justice to go after late-night comedians who made fun of him.

In a lengthy report on Trump's second-term ambitions, sources told the publication that Trump believed that comedians who mocked him on television were guilty of giving what amounted to illegal campaign contributions to Democrats.

And:

"During his 2024 campaign, according to a source with direct knowledge, Trump has raised this topic again, venting about the need to punish late-night comedians for giving “illegal” campaign contributions to the Democratic Party — in the form of jokes and on-air satire."

Free speech, anyone?

The story was mentioned in The NYTimes:

An article in Rolling Stone said that while Trump was president, he tried to persuade Justice Department officials to use campaign finance laws and equal-time broadcast regulations to rule that anti-Trump jokes on late-night shows were illegal. Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Kimmel were among those on Trump’s list of targets.

Lest we forget:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

And, since all those late-night jokes are regarding politics and/or a politician positioning himself in a political arena, isn't political speech kinda sorta uber-protected?

Well, yes. From The Congressional Research Service:

The Court has long considered political and ideological speech to be at the core of the First Amendment, including speech concerning “politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion.” This speech can take forms beyond the written or spoken word, such as funding or symbolic acts.

So,  next time our MAGA friends warn about how Biden has politicized DOJ, gently remind them that the felon Trump has already looked into it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TWENTY YEARS AGO TODAY! (Reprise)

And this is how I started here at 2PJ.

It's good to be here. Now there are truly 2 political junkies present.

If memory serves, it would be some time before I was posting here exclusively.

My first post here, as I see it now in 20/20 hindsight, was perhaps a tad optimistic as it was about how the reporting at the time burst the bubble of George W. Bush's military heroism.

In case you missed it, Dubya won that election.

Oh well. 

Trump's Promise to Politicize The DOJ

It's right here:

CEASE & DESIST: I, together with many Attorneys and Legal Scholars, am watching the Sanctity of the 2024 Presidential Election very closely because I know, better than most, the rampant Cheating and Skullduggery that has taken place by the Democrats in the 2020 Presidential…

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 8, 2024

Except there was no evidence of of any of this happening in 2020.

Look, for example, here:

The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and found they were without merit. (Learn more about how the changes that have happened since 2020 will affect the 2024 election and beyond.)

Rep. Liz Cheney, the former chair of the House Republican Conference, stated on February 23, 2021: "The president and many around him pushed this idea that the election had been stolen. And that is a dangerous claim. It wasn't true," she said. "There were over 60 court cases where judges, including judges appointed by President Trump and other Republican presidents, looked at the evidence in many cases and said there is not widespread fraud."

Or here:

After the 2020 US presidential election Donald Trump refused to concede, alleging widespread and unparalleled voter fraud. Trump’s supporters deployed several statistical arguments in an attempt to cast doubt on the result. Reviewing the most prominent of these statistical claims, we conclude that none of them is even remotely convincing. The common logic behind these claims is that, if the election were fairly conducted, some feature of the observed 2020 election result would be unlikely or impossible. In each case, we find that the purportedly anomalous fact is either not a fact or not anomalous.

 Or here (this one has ties to Pennsylvania):

Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are seri-
ous. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations
and then proof. We have neither here.

The Trump Presidential Campaign asserts that Pennsylvania’s 2020 election was unfair.
But as lawyer Rudolph Giuliani stressed, the Campaign “doesn’t plead fraud. . . . [T]his is
not a fraud case.” 

And so on.

So when a Republican (any Republican) complains about how President Biden has "politicized" the DOJ - they're just projecting their Trump wet dreams.

Uber-Conservate Cheneys Gonna Vote For Harris

First there's the former member of the House, Liz Cheney: 

Republican former Rep. Liz Cheney will vote for Vice President Kamala Harris in November, she said during remarks at Duke University, according to audio obtained by CNN.

The former Wyoming congresswoman noted the importance of voting for Harris in states like North Carolina, where she appeared on Wednesday.

“I think it is crucially important for people to recognize, not only is what I just said about the danger that Trump poses something that should prevent people from voting for him, but I don’t believe that we have the luxury of writing in candidates’ names, particularly in swing states,” Cheney said.

She made the announcement in North Carolina specifically because it is a battleground state, according to a source close to Cheney.

“And as a conservative, as someone who believes in and cares about the Constitution, I have thought deeply about this, and because of the danger that Donald Trump poses, not only am I not voting for Donald Trump, but I will be voting for Kamala Harris,” she continued. 

Then there's her dad, the former Vice President: 

First, the statement itself:

In our nation’s 248-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him. He can never be trusted with power again.   

As citizens, we each have a duty to put country above partisanship to defend our Constitution. That is why I will be casting my vote for Vice President Kamala Harris.

For those who perhaps don't remember Dick, here's the Times' one paragraph bio:

Mr. Cheney served as White House chief of staff under President Gerald Ford; secretary of defense under President George H.W. Bush and vice president under President George W. Bush, when Mr. Cheney was the architect of the U.S. invasion of Iraq. He was viewed by Democrats as such a force of darkness that he earned the nickname Darth Vader.

This is how far into teh crazie Trump's MAGA party has become. It's too dangerous even for the guy who okayed this:

It is now well established that following the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operated a global, state-sanctioned program in which it abducted scores of people throughout the world, held them in secret detention—sometimes for years—or “rendered” them to various countries, and tortured or otherwise ill-treated them. While the program officially ended in 2009, the cover-up of these crimes appears to be ongoing.

Many detainees were held by the CIA in pitch-dark windowless cells, chained to walls, naked or diapered, for weeks or months at a time. The CIA forced them into painful stress positions that made it impossible for them to lie down or sleep for days, to the point where many hallucinated or begged to be killed to end their misery. It used “waterboarding” and similar techniques to cause near suffocation or drowning, crammed detainees naked into tiny boxes, and prevented them from bathing, using toilets, or cutting their hair or nails for months. “We looked like monsters,” one detainee said of his appearance while in CIA custody.

Dick Cheney thinks Donald Trump is such a threat to democracy that he's now voting for VP Kamala Harris.

 

It Was TWENTY YEARS AGO Today!

Check this aht.

That's the first blog post at this here blog.

Check aht the date:

September 6, 2004.

Twenty years ago today. 

This blog is officially twenty years old.

As such, I'd like to wish the OPJ a happy bloggerversary.

And for those of you who don't know the genesis story of this blog, I'll do my best to tell you what I remember.

It was early 2004 and I was, as they say, between jobs.  I'd met Maria a few months before - we were both volunteers with the local Howard Dean folks.  Anyway, there's only so many resumes you can send out a day when you're unemployed and so I had a lot of time on my hands and so I spent way too much of it watching TV. Enough said.

On local cable (PCNC, to be precise) there was a morning program called "Honsberger Live!" It was an hour long program hosted by the late Fred Honsberger, he of KDKA radio in the afternoons.  The program ran from 10am to 11am and Fred was a local version of Rush Limbaugh - right wing talk show host.

Maria and I had been emailing back and forth and she let me know that she was the "Maria" who called in frequently to Fred's show.  I figured that as I had the time and a phone, I'd do the same.

Our first blog "Honzman is a liar" was born out of fact checking Fred Honsberger.

It lasted through that summer and Maria started this blog as she wanted to write about something other than what Fred was spinning.  So early September, 2004 she set up this blog and started writing on more general, national topics. 

My first blog post here was on Sept 9. More on that in a few days.

Happy Bloggerversary!!

Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow

 

Something very important happens tomorrow.

Fulton County, PA IN THE NEWS!

From CNN this weekend:

A Pennsylvania judge has determined that three 2020 election deniers must pay nearly $1 million in fees as the result of a years-long legal dispute with state officials over voting equipment used during the last presidential race, according to recent court filings.

Recommendations from the judge, who was appointed to serve as a special master overseeing the case, attach a dollar figure to sanctions previously imposed by the state’s Supreme Court against two Republican county commissioners and their attorney for allowing an outside firm to examine voting equipment after the 2020 election – despite a court order prohibiting them to do so, according to the new filings. 

The case, which dates back to 2021, involves actions taken by two Fulton County, Pennsylvania, commissioners – Stuart Ulsh and Randy Bunch – who sought to have Dominion voting equipment examined by a third-party after the 2020 election. Many of former President Donald Trump’s allies falsely blamed Dominion’s software for his election defeat. 

Uh-oh.

We wrote about this some time ago - 11/21/2022.

In writing that piece we found this from Reuters: 

Pennsylvania's top election official has decertified the voting equipment of a rural county that participated in an audit of the 2020 election requested by a Republican state lawmaker and staunch ally of former President Donald Trump.

Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid said on Wednesday that Fulton County violated the state election code by giving a third party access to its election databases and other certified equipment in an audit of the 2020 results.

 

The audit was conducted in December at the request of Republican state Senators Doug Mastriano and Judy Ward, who asked county officials to allow Wake Technology Services Inc to probe the county's results, according to media reports.

 Does Doug Mastriano have any comment on the million in fees his co-conspirators are now facing?

RE-Indicted! Trump was RE-INDICTED

 From The New York Times:

Federal prosecutors on Tuesday issued a pared-down version of an indictment accusing former President Donald J. Trump of plotting to overturn the 2020 election, stripping out some charges and tweaking others to help the case survive the Supreme Court’s recent ruling granting former presidents broad immunity.

The revised indictment, issued in Federal District Court in Washington, represented an attempt by prosecutors in the office of the special counsel, Jack Smith, to preserve the bulk of their case against the former president while bringing the allegations into line with the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling that former presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for many official acts taken while in office.

You can read it here. 

Some interesting parts.

In a list of co-conspirators, we find:

Co-Conspirator 6, a private political consultant who helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.

Pennsylvania was one of those states.

And in the "Manner and Means" section, we find this:

The Defendant and co- conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate electors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the Vice President, in his capacity as President of the Senate, and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6.

We'll note the change in the text of Pennsylvania's "fake elector" certificate. 

This is what it looked like:

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, on the understanding that if, as a result of a final non-appealable Court Order or other proceeding prescribed by law, we are ultimately recognized as being the duly elected and qualified Electors for President and Vice President of the United States of America from the State of Pennsylvania, hereby certify the following...

I bolded/italicized what was added.

Then there's this:

The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to enlist the Vice President, in his ceremonial role as President of the Senate at the January 6 certification proceeding to fraudulently alter the election results. First, using knowingly false claims of election fraud, the Defendant and co- conspirators attempted to convince the Vice President to use the Defendant's fraudulent electors, reject legitimate electoral votes, or send legitimate electoral votes to state legislatures for review rather than counting them. When that failed, on the morning of January 6, the Defendant and co-conspirators repeated knowingly false claims ofelection fraud to gathered supporters, falsely told them that the Vice President had the authority to and might alter the election results, and directed them tothe Capitol to obstruct the certification proceeding and exert pressure on the Vice President to take the fraudulent actions he had previously refused.

And, as we all know, this happened.

The White House switchboard logs show that Pennsylvania State Senator Doug Mastriano spoke on the phone with Donald Trump on the night of January 5.  After that call, Trump instructed the switchboard to notify the Vice President's office that they should expect a call from Mastriano.

Then there's this:

On November 25, the day after Pennsylvania's Governor signed a certificate of ascertainment and thus certified to the federal government that Biden's electors were the legitimate electors for the state, Co-Conspirator 1 orchestrated an event at a hotel in Gettysburg attended by state legislators. Co- Conspirator 1 falsely claimed that Pennsylvania had issued 1.8 million absentee ballots and received 2.5 million in return. In the days thereafter, a Campaign staffer wrote internally that Co-Conspirator 1's allegation was "just wrong" and "[t] here's no way to defend it." The Deputy Campaign Manager responded, "We have been saying this for a while. It's very frustrating."

That "event" at that Gettysburg hotel was Doug Mastriano's event.

The hearing on election irregularities in Gettysburg was historic. @PASenateGOP @SenatorArgall pic.twitter.com/DouU5fbkLs

— Senator Doug Mastriano (@SenMastriano) November 26, 2020

Does Doug Mastriano have any comment on Trump's re-indictment?

More Republicans Speak Out Against Trump

From USA Today:

More than 200 Republicans who previously worked for either former President George W. Bush, the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., or Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president in an open letter Monday obtained exclusively by USA TODAY.

The letter from alums of the three Republican presidential nominees prior to former President Donald Trump comes on the heels of a Democratic National Convention last week in Chicago that showcased Republican detractors of the GOP nominee. At least five former aides to former President George H.W. Bush also signed the letter, which has 238 signatures in all.

A similar group of about 150 anti-Trump former staffers of Bush, McCain and Romney pledged support for President Joe Biden in the 2020 election.

In case you missed the link above, you can read the letter here. 

From the letter:

At home, another four years of Donald Trump’s chaotic leadership, this time focused on advancing the dangerous goals of Project 2025, will hurt real, everyday people and weaken our sacred institutions. 

Abroad, democratic movements will be irreparably jeopardized as Trump and his acolyte JD Vance kowtow to dictators like Vladimir Putin while turning their backs on our allies. 

We can’t let that happen.

The USA Today, a few paragraphs later, added:

Over the weekend, a dozen prominent Republican attorneys who worked for former President Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush endorsed Harris for president. The group included conservative former federal appellate Judge Michael Luttig, who plans to vote for a Democratic president for the first time.

Following the links you get to this at Fox:

A dozen Republican White House lawyers who served in the administrations of then-Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush are endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris in her race against GOP nominee former President Donald Trump.

"We endorse Kamala Harris and support her election as President because we believe that returning former President Trump to office would threaten American democracy and undermine the rule of law in our country," the lawyers wrote in a letter that the signatories shared first with Fox News Digital.

That must've made so so many people happy at Fox "News."

 

Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster on Donald Trump

From CNN:

Until now, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster has held his fire about his stint in the Trump White House. McMaster served with distinction in key American conflicts of the past decades: the Gulf War, the Iraq War and the war in Afghanistan, but as McMaster recounts in his new book, “At War with Ourselves: My Tour of Duty in the Trump White House,” in some ways, his most challenging tour as a soldier was his last one: serving as the national security adviser to a notoriously mercurial president.  

In his blistering, insightful account of his time in the Trump White House, McMaster describes meetings in the Oval Office as “exercises in competitive sycophancy” during which Trump’s advisers would flatter the president by saying stuff like, “Your instincts are always right” or, “No one has ever been treated so badly by the press.” Meanwhile, Trump would say “outlandish” things like, “Why don’t we just bomb the drugs?” in Mexico or, “Why don’t we take out the whole North Korean Army during one of their parades?”

And:

...McMaster writes that in the aftermath of his 2020 electoral defeat, Trump’s “ego and love of self… drove him to abandon his oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution,’ a president’s highest obligation.” McMaster adds, “The attack on the US Capitol stained our image, and it will take a long-term effort to restore what Donald Trump, his enablers, and those they encouraged took from us that day.

And from CBS:

His first real business meeting with Trump was a presidential daily brief, an intelligence briefing that all presidents get. McMaster said, "I have a distinct impression of that meeting of being really not very effective for the president. President Trump plays to an audience, and it was too big of an audience in the Oval Office."

Martin asked, "And would the audience play to him?"

"The audience would play to him. I describe the environment as an environment of competitive sycophancy," McMaster replied.

"Did he want advice, or did he want flattery?"

"The president wanted advice; he also wanted flattery. He really likes the adulation. In many ways he's kind of addicted to adulation from his political base, from people around him."

 A very stable genius, indeed.

VP Harris' Speech

You can read a transcript of the speech here.

President Biden's Speech

You can read it here.

Meanwhile, Outside

More sciency stuff from the scientivists at NOAA:

July 2024 was the warmest July on record for the globe in NOAA's 175-year record. The July global surface temperature was 1.21°C (2.18°F) above the 20th-century average of 15.8°C (60.4°F). This is 0.03°C (0.05°F) warmer than the previous July record set last year, and the 14th consecutive month of record-high global temperatures. This breaks the longest record warm global temperature streak in the modern record (since 1980) previously set from May 2015—May 2016. July 2024 marked the 48th consecutive July with global temperatures, at least nominally, above the 20th-century average.

Climatologically, July is the warmest month of the year. As the warmest July on record, July 2024 was more likely than not the warmest month on record for the globe since 1850.

But probably not for long, sadly.

And now the chart:

Yep. It's still getting warmer out there.

Dave McCormick Is Lying About...Dave McCormick

 I caught this ad on the TEEVEE yesterday:

Classic career politician. Dishonest, weak, and unwilling to take responsibility for his destructive actions.

Here's the truth:

Bob Casey owns the greatest illegal immigration crisis in our nation's history—and it's killing thousands of Pennsylvanians with fentanyl. https://t.co/kMbeNfxaBL pic.twitter.com/ebYKA9J9vw

— Dave McCormick (@DaveMcCormickPA) August 11, 2024

And here's how the Connecticut resident starts:

At Westpoint we had a code: Cadets don't lie, cheat, steal or tolerate those who do. 

Bob Casey is lying about me and I won't tolerate it. I never made any investments in the makers of illegal fentanyl. Ever.

Did you catch the weasel word?  I'll reprint that last part to emphasize it:

I never made any investments in the makers of illegal fentanyl. [Emphasis added.]

See it now?  By adding the modifier, Dave has given away the game. He just hopes you won't notice.

And this is what I mean: By saying he never invested in the makers of illegal fentanyl, he's all but admitting he invested in the makers of legal fentanyl.

Now let's go take a look at what Dave's complaining about. In the tweet (are they still called tweets??) linked there's this text from the Casey campaign:

In 2021, we lost over 4,000 Pennsylvanians to fentanyl. 

That same year, my opponent invested in China’s main producer of fentanyl.

 Over at The Keystone, Sean Kitchen had the receipts:

However, federal tax forms show that Bridgewater Associates invested in China’s largest fentanyl producer, Humanwell Healthcare, when McCormick served as CEO of Bridgewater Associates.

In 2021, seven Bridgewater Associates hedge funds held close to $1.7 million in stock in Humanwell Healthcare, which is traded on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. 

A 2022 Rand Corporation report on comparing the production of opiates stated that Humanwell Healthcare produces 90% of China’s fentanyl. 

So the hedge fund did invest in China's main producer of fentanyl, right?

So Dave McCormick is lying by saying that Casey accused him of investing in illegal producers of fentanyl, right?

So what about that cadet code, Dave?

And how about applying the code to the guy you're supporting for president. Donald Trump owes nearly a half billion in fines for committing real estate fraud and for defaming a woman he sexually assaulted.

Note to Dave: "Fraud" is cheating and "defamation" is lying. And do I need to explain the sexual assault part?

Doug Mastriano's Former "Senior Counsel" In The News!

From The Washington Post:

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes (D) reached a cooperation agreement Monday with Jenna Ellis, who was a legal adviser to Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign and was one of 18 defendants indicted in April on felony charges related to alleged efforts to try to subvert President Biden’s victory in the state four years ago, according to prosecutors.

The attorney general has agreed to drop nine felony charges against Ellis in exchange for her full cooperation with the investigation into the GOP plan to try to deliver Arizona’s 11 electoral votes to Trump instead of the rightful winner, Biden.

She was also connected to PA State Senator Doug Mastriano's campaign for governor:

Doug Mastriano, Pennsylvania’s Republican nominee for governor who has pushed Donald Trump’s election lies, said Monday that he had appointed Trump’s former campaign lawyer as a senior legal adviser to his own campaign. 

In case you've forgotten.

Anyway, you can find the plea agreement here. 

The important section seems to be this one:

Jenna Ellis shall waive the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and shall provide truthful information in any and all interviews given to representatives of the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, and shall testify completely and truthfully at any time and any place requested by the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, including at any state or federal grand jury proceeding, forfeiture proceeding, bond hearing, pretrial hearing, civil and criminal trial, retrial or post-trial hearing. Jenna Ellis agrees to answer all questions on direct, cross-examination and redirect examination truthfully and completely.

And there's also this:

All such information and testimony from Jenna Ellis shall be truthful, honest, candid, and complete with no knowing material false statements or omissions. Such information and testimony shall include all criminal activity known to Jenna Ellis.

And this:

Jenna Ellis shall neither attempt to protect any person or entity through false information or omissions nor falsely implicate any person or entity.

I realize the Arizona AG is looking for information regarding the Arizona fake elector scheme, but what do you think the chances are the Pennsylvania's fake elector scheme might also come up in any of those conversations?

Let's review.

The New York Times reported:

As they organized the fake elector scheme, lawyers appointed a “point person” in seven states to help organize those electors who were willing to sign their names to false documents. In Pennsylvania, that point person was Douglas V. Mastriano, a proponent of Mr. Trump’s lies of a stolen election who is now the Republican nominee for governor.

But even Mr. Mastriano needed assurances to go along with a plan other Republicans were telling him was “illegal,” according to a Dec. 12 email sent by Ms. Bobb that also referred to Mr. Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City.

“Mastriano needs a call from the mayor. This needs to be done. Talk to him about legalities of what they are doing,” she wrote, adding: “Electors want to be reassured that the process is * legal * essential for greater strategy.”

Jenna Ellis has already admitted to lying about the 2020 election:

Jenna Ellis, a lawyer who represented President Donald J. Trump after his loss in the 2020 election, admitted in a sworn statement released on Wednesday that she had knowingly misrepresented the facts in several of her public claims that widespread voting fraud led to Mr. Trump’s defeat.

The admissions by Ms. Ellis were part of an agreement to accept public censure and settle disciplinary measures brought against her by state bar officials in Colorado, her home state. Last year, the officials opened an investigation of Ms. Ellis after a complaint from the 65 Project, a bipartisan legal watchdog group.

And Rudy Giuliani was disbarred for it: 

Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, federal prosecutor and legal adviser to Donald Trump, was disbarred in New York on Tuesday after a court found he repeatedly made false statements about Trump’s 2020 election loss.

The Manhattan appeals court ruled Giuliani, who had his New York law license suspended in 2021 for making false statements around the election, is no longer allowed to practice law in the state, effective immediately. 

And that's who the Trump campaign sent to convince Doug Mastriano of the "legality" of the fake elector scheme.

Any comment from Pennsylvania State Senator Doug Mastriano regarding these latest events?