Tom Ferrick over at the Philadelphia Inquirer (do they really call it "the inky"??) has a new column it. Turns out that Rick's a hypocrite. The phrase"no shame" even comes up in the column.
No shame? RICK? Say it ain't so!
Since 2001, the foundation has served as a platform for Santorum to espouse "compassionate conservatism." It has served, de facto, as a privately financed source of WAMs - an acronym for "walking around money," the grants pols so love to spread among groups to build goodwill and burnish their image.And now?
In the spring, when I first looked into Operation Good Neighbor, Santorum's presence was hard to ignore. The Web site featured 34 pictures of the senator, most in the same pose: standing amid smiling recipients, handing over oversized checks, usually in the amount of $10,000.
The charity claims to have given out more than $700,000 since its inception. It rarely gives to the same group twice. It does not offer sustained support. It prefers one-shot (or, rather, one-photograph) deals.
If you visit the Web site of the Operation Good Neighbor Foundation, you'll come away with the impression that it is a little charity that is based in Bryn Mawr and does good deeds.I guess Rick didn't want his face plastered all over the "charity's" website given the bad press it received. But what's the story? Ferrick described how Operation Good Neighbor works its magic:
These days, there's hardly any mention of its founder. Except for one brief reference, he's become a nonperson, a la the old Soviet days.
If I contribute $2,100 to the Santorum campaign (the individual limit under law), it will be duly recorded and open for the public to see.See? It's a way to get around campaign finance laws. All Rick has to do is to have a few photo-ops that show the "charity" giving out some big checks and he gets to use the rest as WAM - "Walking Around Money."
If I give $27,900 to Operation Good Neighbor, though, my name and amount of donation remain secret. As an added benefit, I get to deduct the donation from my taxes.
Now, I ask you: How does Rick Santorum see my gift? As a donor, I hope he sees it as a lump sum - $30,000 donated by his pal, Tom.
But dayvoe, you might ask, this is just par-for-the-course political corruption on Lil Ricky's part. Where is that hypocrisy you mentioned? Where is it? Where? Where?
Here it is:
In the spring, after bad mojo settled around these foundations, Sen. Max Baucus (D., Mont.) offered an amendment to require foundations started by elected officials to disclose the names and gifts of all donors who gave more than $250.And can we guess what happens next?
For the millisecond that amendment was alive, Santorum supported it, according to Rick Cohen, the recently retired director of the National Center for Responsive Philanthropy. [emphasis added]
Accordingly, this summer my colleague Carrie Budoff wrote to Operation Good Neighbor, asking it to disclose its donors and their gifts.See? No Shame.
Last week, she heard back. The foundation declined to disclose, saying it wanted to respect the privacy of donors.
When I told Cohen, his reaction was: "He cosponsors that [Baucus] amendment and then he refuses to reveal his donors? He has no shame."[emphasis added]
Someone say "Amen."
But there's always more with Rick Santorum. Ferrick writes that now Rick's trying his darndest to distance his corrupt ass from the "charity."
In the midst of a difficult reelection campaign, Santorum has sought to erase his ties to the foundation.Rick Santorum - He has no shame.
When radio host Don Imus asked him about it earlier this year, the senator replied: "I try to keep my relationship as just someone who sort of shows up at events to help folks raise money and take pictures with organizations that receive the grants. I don't have any involvement in who gets these grants... [or] involvement in raising the money directly. I don't ask anybody for money, and to be honest with you, for the most part, I don't really know that many people who give to the charity."
Translated: I have nothing to do with it, except to show up to take the credit.