Democracy Has Prevailed.

April 11, 2007

Reform Pittsburgh Now

This evening, in the rooms where his mayoral campaign once hummed along and then shut itself down, Bill Peduto began an interesting political experiment. Using the network he has leftover from that campaign he's looking to kick start another local political movement - Reform Pittsburgh Now!

Clad casually (see picture), he began the meeting with a brief summary of the reasons he unplugged his run for the Mayor's office. He said he would have lost, and lost big. The loss would have damaged any chance of further reform in this city. The only way to level the playing field against Luke Ravenstahl's huge poll numbers was to go negative - big time. But going negative would inevitably have alienated his supporters and so on.

Peduto reiterated just how big Ravenstahl's poll numbers were with a joke (now safe to tell, he said, as it's no longer Holy Week). Peduto said that if Jesus himself were running in this campaign not only would Luke still win big, but he'd get the carpenter's union endorsement to boot.

Forgive me but it took me a few minutes to get the carpenter's union joke.

He went on to say that there's an odd mindset in the city. People are tired of business as usual, HOWEVER they see the solution to business as usual as Luke Ravenstahl.

So what was the meeting for? He's looking to have Pittsburgh's progressive community have a greater hand in setting the agenda for reforming city politics. The crowd of about 75 was faced with 10 or so desks, each with a sheet of paper taped to it. Handwritten on each sheet of paper was a policy issue - Economic Development, Education, Art/Technology and so on.

Everyone was then invited to head over to the policy group with which they were most comfortable and start brainstorming. The plan was to have a set of reform policies in place by the end of the month of May. At that point, Peduto would then begin to present them, one by one, to City Council. Within a few minutes each table had some sort of crowd around it, though of the ten or so tables there, most of the buzz seemed to be happening around the Economic Development, Transit, and Public Safety tables.

I guess that's what's on people's minds.

Peduto said while he was happy with the showing tonight, he's looking to expand the group to possibly 600 by the end of the year. It'll be made up of people interested in policy, but not necessarily politics.

When I asked him HIS place in the group, he said he's the voice. When the agenda is set, his seat at City Council will be the access point for the reform group into city politics. The existence of the group, he said "is to show other elected officials that it's safe to jump into water."

Earlier in the evening, when commenting on why it's important to have such an organization pushing a reform agenda, he said, "If we don't do it, no one's going to."

9 comments:

The Burgher said...

And to think there was a Pens game to boot. He just might end up with 600 people.

Mark Rauterkus said...

The day after Bill chickened out of the race I sent him an open letter calling for his attention, again, on the issue of campaign finance reform.

He didn't reply to me about that letter -- yet -- other to say he got it and would get back to me later.

Nothing.

I've waited for years on this topic. He should do NOTHING else other than campaign finance reform.

And, of course, return phone calls.

Campaign finance reform might not make it far among other members of council -- but -- I'm not sure. It is an issue that will divide the pretenders from the real deal reformes too. Plus, it needs care for sake of Constitutional Rights and freedom.

Plus, a great work product to kick-start the discussion was already done, months and months ago. We did the heavy lifting in a committee he called.

Laura said...

That's kinda cute. Too bad I had class.

Anonymous said...

As Bill knows, you truly only reform from within. Why doesn't he seriously try to work with Luke inside the administration? They both respect each other. Bill voted for him for president of city council. Think of the changes Bill could bring to the city as reformer and policy wonk. With Luke's leadership and popularity and Bill's vision, man, think of the real changes that could occur!!

Anonymous said...

Did not know about it, so could'nt comment then...

Maria said...

Luke does not want reform P-E-R-I-O-D

Char said...

Justin,

Whether Bill and Luke respect each other is not as important as the fact that they almost totally disagree on what Pittsburgh needs to do and HOW it needs to be done. Maria is right. The short summary of their differences is that Luke does not want reform P-E-R-I-O-D.

If you look at their city council voting records you will see that they've been on opposite sides of the table from day one. On almost everything. You need common ground to "work together" and you need common constituents for common ground. Bill is beholden to what is best for Pittsburgh. Luke is beholden (as his voting records show) to the special interests whose very survival depends on things staying exactly as they are. Ergo .... We're back to Maria's answer.

If what you mean by "working together" is having Bill contribute the brains and the vision....i.e. Handing over all the "answers" to Luke so Mr. Popular can get more applause....That won't work either. Why? Back to Maria's answer.

As for Bill voting for Luke for Council Prez .... I understand that Luke was a compromise vote. Bill and Motznik were in a deadlock and both realized they were never going to get the votes needed to win. So they called a truce by throwing their votes to the "new guy" who was thought could not do too much damage one way or another. It was kind of a "Let Mikey eat it" vote of confidence. If council had known that O'Connor was going to die ... I doubt Mikey would have ever been handed the keys to the car.

Bram Reichbaum said...

"kinda cute": ROTFL

Mark Rauterkus said...

This was stated above: "As Bill knows, you truly only reform from within."

Think again.

The founding fathers reformed this nation -- and didn't do it from within.

Hell, GWB reformed Iraq, to a point.

The Emperors of China are gone -- and there wasn't much of a push from within to rid them from the PEOPLE.

Sure, reform can happen from within. But reform can happen with a take down and take over too. There are many paths to reform and change.

Personally, I've stated I want to replace, redirect and then reform. Reform should come third in order. I don't want those in power doing the reforming. Then we'll get 'deformed.'

For instance, Onorato can't make a good decision on buying voting machines despite being told by local experts what to do and what not to do. I don't trust that he (nor Rendell) will be worth a darn when it comes to reforming city government, tax structures, major capital projects, etc.

We need to replace them. Then re-direct operations. Then think about reform.

There are systems that should work that have been starved. Ethics Hearing Board for one. Citizens Police Review Board for another.