So let me ask you, where's the evidence in this inevitable anti-science editorial from Scaife's Tribune-Review?
The Obama administration released the National Climate Assessment on Tuesday. And to sell its latest installment of pseudoscience in promotion of social re-engineering required to combat “man-made” climate change, it invited in select meteorologists to indoctrinate them in how to propagandize the report and bring climate-cluckerism into every home. Be afraid — be very afraid.You'll notice there are no actual facts here. No references to evidence, experts or any scientific experts. Their argument, such as it is, has no such things. There's not even a good fake any more.
So wrong in so many of its alleged causes and effects — a natural consequence of being so injurious to the scientific process — the assessment must be considered for what it is: a political manifesto that seeks to reorder the world economy for “the greater good,” a “good” that serves not mankind nor even the planet but those in positions of government power.
So where is the science? The evidence? The experts?
Here, in the Climate Assessment released this week. Take a look:
Evidence from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans, collected by scientists and engineers from around the world, tells an unambiguous story: the planet is warming, and over the last half century, this warming has been driven primarily by human activity—predominantly the burning of fossil fuels.What evidence?
And here's the description:
Global annual average temperature (as measured over both land and oceans) has increased by more than 1.5°F (0.8°C) since 1880 (through 2012). Red bars show temperatures above the long-term average, and blue bars indicate temperatures below the long-term average. The black line shows atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in parts per million (ppm). While there is a clear long-term global warming trend, some years do not show a temperature increase relative to the previous year, and some years show greater changes than others. These year-to-year fluctuations in temperature are due to natural processes, such as the effects of El Niños, La Niñas, and volcanic eruptions. (Figure source: updated from Karl et al. 2009)Each one of those columns, red and blue, represent data. Lots and lots of data - in this case global average temperatures. The black like represents different data - CO2 in parts per million. It all comes from vast reams of science journals - all tested and peer-reviewed. It's something the science deniers don't have.
So unless you're going to make the extraordinary assertion that this is all a big fake, the evidence stands. The science stands. The world is warming up.
Where's the braintrust's extraordinary evidence to the contrary?
They don't tell you because they can't tell you.
And they can't tell you because it doesn't exist.