Democracy Has Prevailed.

October 26, 2015

Why you need to vote for Heather Arnet for PA State Senate (37th District)



The Reasons to Vote for Heather Arnet
On the Issues:
First of all, Heather has an actual issues page--Guy doesn't! You can see her positions on issues related to the workplace, education, taxes, healthcare & services, the environment, rights & representation, and more. She's particularly committed to fighting to:
- Attract high quality jobs to our district;
- Strengthen retirement security for seniors;
- Ensure we provide property tax relief for the middle class and seniors;
- Fully fund our school system and make high-quality pre-k available to all;
- Provide safe, affordable healthcare for our families that includes women making their own healthcare decisions.
Bio:
Professionally, she's worked to increase rights and opportunities for working families as the CEO of the Women and Girls Foundation, as well as serving on the Pittsburgh Public Schools Board of Education. She's also won numerous awards and has frequently appeared in both the local and national media.

Bonus Points:
A piddly 18 percent of the 253-member PA General Assembly are women. That earns PA the ignoble distinction of ranking 39th in the nation for the percentage of women in our state Legislature. We are grossly under-represented! (Also where the clever "We don't need another guy in Harrisburg" line comes from in her above ad.)

Additionally, knowing Heather personally, I can certainly vouch for her as a passionate and genuine person and fighter for rights for all.

The Reasons Not to Vote for Guy Reschenthaler
On the Issues:
As mentioned above, Guy has no issues page or, hell, even a paragraph on his website. You are meant to vote for Guy because he's a great American! He touts being "a son of western Pennsylvania" and "born here and raised in the values and traditions that make our region great"!

But you can get to where he stands on some issues by looking at his endorsements which include an anti-choice group and, not one, but two separate pro gun groups (just in case you didn't already know he was a Republican).

Bio:
Reschenthaler is running primarily on his bio. The headline of which is "Iraq War Veteran | Former District Magistrate | Former Navy Prosecutor" and then the repeat about the whole "son of western Pennsylvania" thing, tradition, values, etc.

Penalty Points:
Oh, my, where to start? While Guy and the Republican Party have labeled Heather as an "extreme liberal," Guy's actual extremist values would make the Tea Party stand up and cheer, while going so far as to possibly embarrass the more enlightened members.

It seems that Guy used to host a conservative podcast in 2013 called "The Sound of Freedom with Hig and Resch," along with his co-host, Carl Higbie. They discussed topics like taxes, immigration and gun control and had on Tea Party members and Oath Keepers as guests.

It's worse than you may imagine. While his co-host made the most disgusting comments (“You cross my border, I will shoot you in the face” and “The black race is lazier than the white race” and "I don't like Muslim people"), he made them with Guy's name on the show and in some cases with little push-back. Guy himself said that people on government assistance are "abusing the trust the government." Guy calls Social Security and Medicare “scary,” because “we can’t cut them if we wanted to.” He says that they “turn our government into an entitlement generating machine."

If you can stomach it, you can hear and read more clips at http://guyreschenthalerpa.com as well as this from Keystone Progress:


Guy Reschenthaler: The Dark Side of Technology from Keystone Progress PAC on Vimeo.

So now ask yourself, not just "Do we need another guy in Harrisburg?" but "Do we need this extremist Guy in Harrisburg?"

And then, go vote for Heather Arnet. And, even if you don't live in her district, go sign up to help now through election day. And, throw some $$ her way.


11 comments:

Social Justice NPC Anti-Paladin™ said...

Gun Grabber

Heather supports:
Common sense gun regulations that ensure a basic level of safety and responsibility, including improved background checks and closing loopholes that enable illegal gun trafficking;

Ol' Froth said...

So you're against basic safety and responsibility and improved background checks and for loopholes that enable illegal gun trafficking?

Maria Lupinacci said...

Of course he's against it!

Ol' Froth said...

What gets me is that he's for illegal gun trafficking.

Social Justice NPC Anti-Paladin™ said...

I am against the backdoor Gun registry required for Common sense gun regulations that ensure a basic level of safety and responsibility, including improved background checks and closing loopholes that enable illegal gun trafficking;

Ol' Froth said...

We've got it. Your anti-safety, anti-responsibility, and pro trafficking.

Social Justice NPC Anti-Paladin™ said...

"Your anti-safety, anti-responsibility, and pro trafficking."
That is the problem with 4th amendment of the Constitution. It hinders Law Enforcement from keeping us safe.

Does Heather support LEBOR and strengthening the PA wiretapping/eavesdropping law to prevent the violating of Police Officers' privacy, distracting them from their duties and jeopardizing Officer safely.

Ol' Froth said...

What, now your for warrantless search and seizure? I've been in law enforcement for more that 23 years and never had an issue with the 4th Amendment preventing me from doing my job, or "hindering" my efforts to keep you safe. And I could care less if someone wants to record me while I do my job.

Social Justice NPC Anti-Paladin™ said...

According to the FBI, the Youtube effect is hurting police and making them less effective.
https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/10/fbi-director-blames-citizens-with-cameras-for-increase-in-homicides/
Undermines Police morale
http://blog.simplejustice.us/2015/10/24/comey-the-ferguson-effect-lives/
Fuels witchhunts by Review Boards against the Police.
http://www.copblock.org/145598/citizens-filming-police-getting-rid-of-bad-apples/

Philo Vaihinger said...

I'd vote against her for playing the sex card. No worse than you voting for her for playing it.

Maria Lupinacci said...

What sex card is that? The one that keeps women in the PA General Assembly hovering between 17 and 18%?