I am wondering of the retired Col with a career in military intelligence has read the affidavit yet.
And if he has, whether he's seen this page yet:
For some background, let's take a look at 18 U.S. Code § 793(e):
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; [Emphasis added.]
This part of the USC has each section (a, b, c, and so on) starting with the same phrase ("Whosoever having...") and ending with a linking "or."
The ending of this complicate set of phrases is this:
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.We already know there were classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.
They were held in a place that wasn't deemed secure.
When will there be enough evidence for St. Sen. (and now GOP cand. for PA Gov) to amend his support for Donald Trump?
