Here's today's anouncement:
What genetic mutation motivates a person to wallow in paranoid delusions and then decide to kill to defend his warped world? A criminal justice expert who studies these scumbags tackles that one...Obviously, the first part's about The Shooter. But what of the second? I didn't hear the show and so I have no idea exactly what they said (or how they said it) but I wonder if Pintek's thought this fully through.
Plus, Washington Times columnist Frank Gaffney warns that the Obama administration is giving away US Sovereignty...
Here's the thing, Mike: There are crazy unbalanced people all over the place. Fueling their crazie only makes things worse.
Some fuel for teh crazie? Washington Times columnist Frank Gaffney.
Point one:
Another question yet to be resolved is whether Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States, a prerequisite pursuant to the U.S. Constitution. There is evidence Mr. Obama was born in Kenya rather than, as he claims, Hawaii. There is also a registration document for a school in Indonesia where the would-be president studied for four years, on which he was identified not only as a Muslim but as an Indonesian. If correct, the latter could give rise to another potential problem with respect to his eligibility to be president.Point two:
When [Obama] uses the word "respect" in the context of a waist-bow to the King of Saudi Arabia for example and talks about respectful language. Which is code for those who adhere to Sharia that we will submit to Sharia.And Pintek said he was going to talk to Gaffney about how the Obama administration is "giving away US Sovereignty." Presumably they discussed this column from the Washington Times:
How many Americans are aware that some, let alone an actual majority, of the Supreme Court's justices believe that this country should be ruled by something other than the Constitution of the United States, laws made pursuant thereto and treaties clearly consistent with it? Assuredly, few of us know that such an assault on our sovereignty is afoot; in all likelihood, fewer still would support it.Richard Poplawski was determined to protect his constitutional rights.
The same would likely apply to Harold Koh's embrace of myriad other controversial transnationalist initiatives. He favors U.S. submission to the International Criminal Court, enabling that tribunal to have the right tomorrow to take up the sort of foreign prosecutions of Americans contemplated by Spain's Judge Garzon today.
4 comments:
I guess Poplawski was an avid fan of Mike Pintek. May Poplawski fry on the chair (yes, I am a supporter of the death penalty), and may Pintek never be able to get the stain of blood from his hands, a la Lady MacBeth.
Really, every day these guys become more like the Rwandan hate radio guys. They are only shades less sick than Poplawski.
For the record I have no idea whether Poplawski ever heard of Pintek or Gaffney.
I wasn't talking about that.
But if you knowingly feed teh crazie, you shouldn't be surprised if you see violence from the fringe.
there's free speech and then there's hate speech and a lot of the big right wing talkers cross that line all of the time.
someday maybe someone will file a civil lawsuit against them and just have the jury read written transcripts of their shows without the names of the hosts and then decide if it's hate or not.
i think without the glamor of high powered names, like beck or hannity etc.
they just might be convicted of hate speech.
i think their high profile and fame protects them.
Post a Comment