Dear Senator Toomey:And I will be posting whatever response I get from him or his office.
It's me, again. Your constituent who also writes for the local Pittsburgh-based political blog, "2 Political Junkies."
Yesterday, the Washington Post reported that Donald Trump and his advisors have been privately discussing replacing Attorney General Jeff Sessions - possibly as a part of a plan to stop Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russia and any possible links it had to Trump's presidential campaign.
Given that you've already publicly declared that you have "every confidence" in Mueller's "integrity and professionalism", is this OK with you?
Is it OK with you that Donald J. Trump, as elected leader of the country and (more importantly, it seems) leader of your party, has chosen a route so disrespectful of the rule of law? If he gets away with it would the phrase "rule of law" have any meaning anymore?
I await your response.
Follow-up:
- First Letter - The Senator's response
- Second Letter - No response so far - (well, this one comes close)
- Third Letter - No response so far
- Fourth Letter - No response so far
- Fifth Letter - No response so far
- Sixth Letter - No response so far
- Seventh Letter - The Senator's response
- Eighth Letter - No response so far
- Ninth Letter - The Senator's response
- Tenth Letter - No response so far
- Eleventh Letter - No response so far
- Twelfth Letter - No response so far
- Thirteenth Letter - No response so far
- Fourteenth Letter - No response so far
- Fifteenth Letter - No response so far
- Sixteenth Letter -The Senator's response
- Seventeenth Letter - No response so far
- Eighteenth Letter - No response so far
- Nineteenth Letter - No response so far
- Twentieth Letter - No response so far
"has chosen a route so disrespectful of the rule of law? If he gets away with it would the phrase "rule of law" have any meaning anymore? "
ReplyDelete"rule of law" lost its meaning with Qualified Immunity.
But Toomey is Blue Tongue who like Sessions and supports less Law Enforcement transparency and accountability.
They also support Law Enforcement being allowed to take the property of people not convicted of any crime under civil forfeiture.