Showing posts with label Michael Lamb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Lamb. Show all posts

March 7, 2013

Keystone Analytics Poll Shows Peduto Ahead by Double Digits


Via Keystone Analytics:
Current Councilman Bill Peduto appears strongest out of the gate polling the highest among five potential candidates tested. Peduto, along with City Controller Michael Lamb, both have very strong name recognition with these voters but Peduto’s recognition translates to actual support with 30 percent of likely Democratic Primary voters saying they would vote for him if the election were held today.
Jack Wagner gets 20%, Lamb comes in at 13% and Jim Ferlo and Darlene Harris are in the single digits.

In other good news for Peduto, he was endorsed today by three elected officials from Pittsburgh's southern neighborhoods: PA State Rep. Erin C. Molchany, Pittsburgh City Councilor Natalia Rudiak and Pittsburgh City Councilor Bruce Kraus.

Additionally, Peduto announced he hit a half million dollars in donations this week.

Maybe Peduto is doing so well because he has actual ideas and "political imagination."


*** Obligatory Disclaimer: As everyone should know by now, I've been working part-time for People For Peduto since 2010.

March 5, 2013

Hat Meet Ring


Hail, Hail, the Gang's All!

Lil Mayor Luke does Pittsburgh a solid and drops out of the race, but now apparently every Johnny-come-lately (and Joanne-come-lately) wants to throw their hat into the ring. Retired PA State Auditor General Jack Wagner and City Council President Darlene Harris are already gathering petitions. PA State Sen. Jim Ferlo is planning to begin gathering signatures today. And, according to The Trib, City Councilman Ricky Burgess and State Rep. Jake Wheatley are feeling out the unions, but aren't commenting to the media. They of course join City Councilman Bill Peduto and City Controller Michael Lamb.

Who's on first? According to PoliticsPA:
Today’s developments benefit Peduto most directly; Wagner and Lamb share a political base in Pittsburgh’s south side/south hills.

November 27, 2012

The election is over (Prez), the election is just beginning (Mayor)

Chances are if you're a Democrat in the City of Pittsburgh, you saw this in the past couple of days:
Either you got a mailing, you got an email, you went to the website, or you saw a tweet about it.
While no one has yet formally declared they are running for Mayor of Pittsburgh, City Councilman Bill Peduto filed the paperwork necessary to run back in September; current Mayor, Luke Ravenstahl, said he was seeking reelection earlier this month; and Controller Michael Lamb said he will be running yesterday. There will also be dueling parties in NYC next month during Pennsylvania Society weekend for Bill and Luke.
As a longtime Peduto supporter, I of course urge you all to go to billpeduto.com and hit those 'Donate' and 'Volunteer' buttons!
We're a 5 to 1 Democratic city -- can we please also be a progressive one?!
 
*** Obligatory Disclaimer: As everyone should know by now, I've been working part-time for People For Peduto since 2010.

December 27, 2010

"Potential Resolution of Pension Funding Possible"


(Click to enlarge)


The press conference:
· tomorrow morning, December 28, 2010

· 9 a.m.

· Outside City Council Chambers

· 5th Floor City-County Building, 414 Grant Street

May 14, 2009

Pittsburgh City Councilor Theresa Smith's Deceptive Fliers

Bram at The Pittsburgh Comet has posted a flyer from Theresa Smith who is running in the primary election on Tuesday for City Council in District 2. He points out that the flyer makes it seem as though Smith won the endorsement of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The P-G endorsed Georgia Blotzer (both for the May 19th primary as well as in the shockingly low turnout February special election which Smith won):
Blotzer in District 2: She's the best council choice for the Democrats
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Active choice: Blotzer deserves a seat on City Council
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Moreover, Smith's flyer also misleads voters about what funding she has secured.

Naturally, she's the Committee endorsed candidate.

[sigh]

On the brighter side, Georgia Blotzer has won the endorsement of Michael Lamb.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Obligatory Disclaimer: As mentioned before, I've been paid by the Georgia for Council campaign to create and maintain her web site: www.georgiaforcouncil.com
.

April 28, 2009

Oh, the irony!


First, it took a Republican to switch parties for Pennsylvania to get a pro choice senator.


And speaking of choice, once again, Pennsylvanians will have little to no choice in their Democratic primary vote for US Senator -- the fix is in.

[sigh]
.

May 16, 2007

Primary 2007


New faces for Pittsburgh City Council: Kraus, Dowd, Burgess


After all the grief back in March over the Peduto mayoral pullout, this morning looks a lot brighter for progressives than anyone had a right to expect.

Machine hacks (There is no machine!) Len Bodack and Jeff Koch were ousted by progressives Patrick Dowd and Bruce Kraus. As other blogs have noted, it was the Pedutoistas who really got behind both these candidates after they no longer had Bill to support. Additionally the much embattled Twanda Carlisle lost heavily to Rev. Ricky Burgess -- instantly lowering the embarrassment quotient on Council. (Now what about Motznik?!)

While County Chief Executive Dan Onorato won easily as expected, his challenger Rick Swartz made a really decent showing with 13.45% of the vote. Especially when you consider that latecomer Swartz ran his campaign on $5,000 vs. over a million collected for Onorato.

I spoke to Swartz Campaign Manager Joy Sabl last night and according to her figures, Rick received about 3 votes for every dollar spent and nearly half the flyers distributed resulted in a vote -- a really good grassroots effort. Rick also received loads of good coverage last night (much owing to PCNC waiting for Onorato and Ravenstahl to show up resulting in their relying on Rick's after party for visuals). Republican curmudgeon Bill Green was quite complimentary towards Rick's grassroots efforts. Likely because he recently ran himself and has discovered exactly how much "fun" it is to got out collecting petition signatures in the coldest month of the year. Most importantly, Onorato's victory speech contained not only a gracious nod to Swartz, but the recognition that voters really do care about public transit. That was a real victory not just for Swartz, but for the residents of Allegheny County.

We also saw a progressive win in the City Controller's race with Michael Lamb getting over 42% of the vote.

And Luke Ravenstahl? Yep, he won resoundingly. But for those of you who have been made to feel crazy by the "Give the kid a chance" contingent, it should be noted that you no longer need to feel like a lone voice in the wilderness. A full 14% of the voters chose not to "I Like Luke." In addition to the 4% who chose to write in someone, another 9% chose to leave their ballot blank for Mayor (38,665 voted citywide for Controller, but only 35,705 voted citywide for Mayor). Moreover, write-in Republican candidate Mark DeSantis received over three times the number of votes needed to get on the ballot in November so it looks like Luke will have to face a debate after all (hehehehe).

All in all, a nice night for those of us who believe that ACDC is the problem.

UPDATE: I want to make sure to note that while I mentioned Bram's assertion that the Peduto folks helped the Dowd and Kraus campaigns, from what I saw, both those camps had tight, really well run efforts and candidates who were on fire. Kudos to their campaigns!

On top of that, as Smitty has commented, Koch really disintegrated in the last two weeks with all his crazy shit. Also, both campaigns paid loads of attention to the Burghosphere which doesn't hurt.

.

April 2, 2007

City Controller Candidate, Michael Lamb

Recently, I had a chance to chat with City Council President Doug Shields on the race for City Controller. I didn't plan it, it just sort of happened. We were talking about Bill Peduto's withdrawal from the mayoral primary and the conversation turned to the Controller race. So it seems only fair to talk to some other candidates for that position.

Seems only fair. And balanced.

Last week, I had the opportunity to chat with current Prothonotary and candidate for the office of City Controller, Michael Lamb. We met at the Starbucks near the Whole Foods on the eastside of town. The coffee, over-priced and bland. The music shifted in that inexorably Starbucks sort of way from a random Brandenburg to Paul Desmond in 5/4. Lamb in a crisp blue shirt, Lamb's campaign manager Doug and I dressed far more casually.

Starting with the same question I posed to Shields, I asked how his campaign was going. Understandably (though that's certainly not a criticism) he said it's "going well." and that the grassroots networking stuff is "firing on all cylinders."

When I asked how he defined "grassroots" that's when the interview took off.

A little backstory is probably necessary here. The previous mayoral primary race (the one that took place waaaay back in 2005) the top three candidates were, Bob O'Connor, Bill Peduto and Michael Lamb in that order. If my memory serves, O'Connor garnered about half the votes, and Peduto and Lamb (more or less) split the remaning half, with Peduto getting a larger share.

So coming in third in that race, in one way or another, he's building on the positives and negatives of that race.

For instance, on one hand he's looking to raise his profile in those sections of the city where he didn't do too well in 2005 (namely those places where O'Connor did very well, like Lincoln Place and Observatory Hill)). On the other, he says he has a greater name recognition because of his participation in the 2005 primary. There's no need for a "learning curve" either for a city-wide race, either. He's got his voter ID database chugging along and just (in a sense) picked up where he left off two years ago.

Additionally with Peduto pulling out of the race, there's some more attention to be paid to the City Controller race.

I asked him the next general set of questions: Assuming everything goes his way and he is elected City Controller, what's he going to do once he gets there? First off, he said, there has to be a "cultural change" in the City Controllers office because right now, it's "dysfunctional" (his term). For instance the office is mandated to do a periodical fiscal and performance audits and they haven't been delivered on time in a long time. When asked how the office is able to get away with it, he smiled and answered, "That's a good question."

Lamb said that he was in a similar position when he took over the Prothonotary's office a number of years ago. He said that when he arrived that office was in "a general malaise" working with what amounted to 19th century technology - books and pens. He updated the office to computers and overcame the internal resistance to change. He said that his experience at the Prothonotary's office would help him at the City Controller's office.

That's an internal - but what about the rest of the city?

The biggest issue of all, the city's distressed status. The budget doesn't do anyting, he said, to address the distressed status of the city. Unless things change, he added, we're going to be right back here now in three years. The Controller's office could, he said, put together real numbers showing a clearer picture of the city's finances. It's a necessary step.