Dear Senator Toomey:And I will be posting whatever response I get from him or his office.
It's me, again - the constituent who writes for the local Pittsburgh-based political blog, "2 Political Junkies."
This one's simple: now that there's been a second allegation of sexual misconduct by Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh, don't you think it would be a good idea to call for a delay in the confirmation vote in order for the FBI to investigate whether these allegations have any merit?
If one or both are true, then wouldn't it be a good idea to know that before the Senate votes to confirm his seat on the highest court in the land? Or would his less than honorable past with women (if it's true) have no bearing on your support? If that's the case, then please explain.
And if one or both aren't true, then wouldn't it be a good idea to know that as well? To settle it once and for all?
Thank you and I await your response.
Follow-up:
- Round-up Volume 1
- Round-up Volume 2
- Round-up Volume 3
- Round-up Volume 4
- Round-up Volume 5
- Sixty-second letter - answered here.
- Sixty-third letter - no response yet
- Sixty-fourth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-fifth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-sixth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-seventh letter - no response yet
- Sixty-eighth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-ninth letter - no response yet
- Seventieth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-first letter - no response yet
- Seventy-second letter - no response yet
- Seventy-third letter - no response yet
- Seventy-forth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-fifth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-sixth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-seventh letter - no response yet
- Seventy-eighth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-ninth letter - no response yet
1 comment:
No.
What Federal crime is Kavanaugh accused of?
Shame on the GOP as the party of misogynist rape apologists for the credibly accused Duke Lacrosse/UVA Frat gang rapists that will hypocritically not defend Hollywood, the media and the press because of Politics, looking for any info to discredit the victim’s story or smear the women by pointing out inconsistencies that proves the rape victims suffered trauma. More discrepancies in a rape victim’s story proves the rape because the traumatic event distorts the memory of the event and anything related to the event.
They created a toxic narrative so bad, insulting and hurtful that progressives refuse to talk about them. Just like the CBC and the teabaggers yelling the N-word at John Lewis.
The Duke Lacrosse Frat Gang rapists were proven guilty because they were indicted by a grand jury and could have been prosecuted Federally under Obama’s DOE #TitleIX guidance.
Post a Comment