Dear Senator Toomey:And I will be posting whatever response I get from him or his office.
It's me, again - the constituent who writes for the local Pittsburgh-based political blog, "2 Political Junkies."
Senator, I am going to revisit the topic of last week's question - the full release of the Mueller report. You've been quoted as saying that "we should err on the side of disclosure" regarding the release of the report.
Does this mean you're supporting the release of the report and it's underlying evidence (minus the necessary redaction of any sensitive National Security/Grand Jury material) to the public?
Does this mean that you're supporting the release of the full report (with no redactions) to all members of Congress?
Thank you and I await your response.
Follow-up:
- Round-up Volume 1
- Round-up Volume 2
- Round-up Volume 3
- Round-up Volume 4
- Round-up Volume 5
- Sixty-second letter - answered here.
- Sixty-third letter - no response yet
- Sixty-fourth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-fifth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-sixth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-seventh letter - no response yet
- Sixty-eighth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-ninth letter - no response yet
- Seventieth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-first letter - no response yet
- Seventy-second letter - no response yet
- Seventy-third letter - no response yet
- Seventy-forth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-fifth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-sixth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-seventh letter - no response yet
- Seventy-eighth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-ninth letter - no response yet
- Eightieth letter - no response yet
- Eighty-first letter - no response yet
- Eighty-second letter - response here
- Eighty-third letter - no response yet
- Eighty-fourth letter - response here
- Eighty-fifth letter - no response yet
- Eighty-sixth letter - no response yet
- Eighty-seventh letter - no response yet
- Eighty-eighth letter - no response yet
- Eighty-ninth letter - no response yet
- Ninetieth letter - no response yet
- Ninety-first letter - no response yet
- Ninety-second letter - no response yet
- Ninety-third letter - no response yet
- Ninety-fourth letter - no response yet
- Ninety-fifth letter - response here
- Ninety-sixth letter - no response yet
- Ninety-seventh letter - no response yet
- Ninety-eighth letter - no response yet
- Ninety-ninth letter - no response yet
- HUNDREDTH letter - no response yet
- Hundred and First letter - no response yet
4 comments:
"Does this mean that you're supporting the release of the full report (with no redactions) to all members of Congress?"
No, Adam Schiff will leak any sensitive National Security/Grand Jury material that portrays Trump in a negative light.
I trust Dayvoe supports the full release of the Barrett report.
"Before the release of the report, three Democrat U.S. Senators, John Kerry, Dick Durbin and Byron Dorgan, forced the redaction of certain pages by attaching a rider to an unrelated appropriations bill."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett_Report
Dayvoe is right that Toomey is too deferentially to the media.
He should tell them to screw off like the Democrats did with the Starr report.
https://therightscoop.com/watch-andy-mccarthy-explains-why-its-just-dumb-that-democrats-want-to-subpoena-the-full-mueller-report/
I am guessing the smoking gun that the Democrats will fight tooth and nail to release is the list of women that Trump cheated with on his wife.
Post a Comment