Dear Senator Toomey:And I will be posting whatever response I get from him or his office.
It's me, again - the constituent who writes for the local Pittsburgh-based political blog, "2 Political Junkies."
As you may already know, Donald Trump Jr. has been subpoenaed by the (Republican led) Senate Intelligence Committee. They reportedly want to ask him about some testimony he gave related to the Trump Tower meeting with the Russians now that it's been contradicted by the Mueller report. (Have you read the report, by the way? It doesn't exonerate the leader of your party on obstruction of justice. Did you know that?)
Recently, your colleague Senator Lindsey Graham (R-GA) has said in an interview that Donald Trump jr. should ignore the subpoena. The senator has since backtracked and said Trump should just "plead the fifth."
I am curious about your take on all this. In our system of co-equal branches of government where each branch serves as a balance to the others how healthy is it for our democracy for one branch (in this case yours) to abandon its Constitutionally mandated function of governmental oversight? A sitting senator advising a private citizen to ignore a Senate subpoena in order to protect a president from congressional oversight?
Are you OK with that?
Thank you and I await your response.
Follow-up:
- Round-up Volume 1
- Round-up Volume 2
- Round-up Volume 3
- Round-up Volume 4
- Round-up Volume 5
- Sixty-second letter - answered here.
- Sixty-third letter - no response yet
- Sixty-fourth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-fifth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-sixth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-seventh letter - no response yet
- Sixty-eighth letter - no response yet
- Sixty-ninth letter - no response yet
- Seventieth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-first letter - no response yet
- Seventy-second letter - no response yet
- Seventy-third letter - no response yet
- Seventy-forth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-fifth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-sixth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-seventh letter - no response yet
- Seventy-eighth letter - no response yet
- Seventy-ninth letter - no response yet
- Eightieth letter - no response yet
- Eighty-first letter - no response yet
- Eighty-second letter - response here
- Eighty-third letter - no response yet
- Eighty-fourth letter - response here
- Eighty-fifth letter - no response yet
- Eighty-sixth letter - no response yet
- Eighty-seventh letter - no response yet
- Eighty-eighth letter - no response yet
- Eighty-ninth letter - no response yet
- Ninetieth letter - no response yet
- Ninety-first letter - no response yet
- Ninety-second letter - no response yet
- Ninety-third letter - no response yet
- Ninety-fourth letter - no response yet
- Ninety-fifth letter - response here
- Ninety-sixth letter - no response yet
- Ninety-seventh letter - no response yet
- Ninety-eighth letter - no response yet
- Ninety-ninth letter - no response yet
- HUNDREDTH letter - no response yet
- Hundred and First letter - no response yet
- Hundred and second letter - no response yet
- Hundred and third letter - no response yet
- Hundred and fourth letter - no response yet
- Hundred and fifth letter - no response yet
- Hundred and sixth letter - no response yet
- Hundred and seventh letter - no response yet
advising a private citizen to [just "plead the fifth."] in order to protect a president from congressional oversight?
ReplyDeleteLois Lerner "plead the fifth."
IMPEACH!
"now that it's been contradicted by the Mueller report. "
ReplyDeleteWith statements from Micheal Cohen.
Care to quote that part? What page of the Mueller report?